Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 99, Issue 3, 1405-1409, February 5, 2002
Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes
David C. Krakauer* and Joshua B. Plotkin,§
* Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501; and § Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540
Communicated by Simon A. Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, December 13, 2001 (received for review August 7, 2001)
Genetic mutations that lead to undetectable or minimal changes in phenotypes are said to reveal redundant functions. Redundancy is common among phenotypes of higher organisms that experience low mutation rates and small population sizes. Redundancy is less common among organisms with high mutation rates and large populations, or among the rapidly dividing cells of multicellular organisms. In these cases, one even observes the opposite tendency: a hypersensitivity to mutation, which we refer to as antiredundancy. In this paper we analyze the evolutionary dynamics of redundancy and antiredundancy. Assuming a cost of redundancy, we find that large populations will evolve antiredundant mechanisms for removing mutants and thereby bolster the robustness of wild-type genomes; whereas small populations will evolve redundancy to ensure that all individuals have a high chance of survival. We propose that antiredundancy is as important for developmental robustness as redundancy, and is an essential mechanism for ensuring tissue-level stability in complex multicellular organisms. We suggest that antiredundancy deserves greater attention in relation to cancer, mitochondrial disease, and virus infection.
To read the entire paper, click here.
[ 08 February 2002: Message edited by: Moderator ]