ISCID Forums
Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | search | faq | forum home

This topic has been moved to Brainstorms.    
next oldest topic   next newest topic
» ISCID Forums   » General   » The Archive   » Jakob Wolf: Two Kinds of Causality: Philosophical Reflections on Darwin's Black Box

   
Author Topic: Jakob Wolf: Two Kinds of Causality: Philosophical Reflections on Darwin's Black Box
Moderator
Administrator
Member # 1

Icon 1 posted 11. November 2002 15:51      Profile for Moderator   Email Moderator   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two Kinds of Causality: Philosophical Reflections on Darwin's Black Box

by Jakob Wolf

ABSTRACT—Michael Behe´s theory of irreducibly complex systems can be supported by epistemological arguments inspired from Immanuel Kant’s critique of the teleological judgement. In an irreducibly complex system you find a causality which works in two direction absolutely simultaneously. The whole is both an effect of the parts and a cause of the parts. The causal connection between the parts and the whole is simultaneously an instance of two-way cause <-> effect. An unintelligent cause-effect-relation can never demonstrate an instance of such a causality. This explains why an irreducibly complex system is not susceptible to explanation by reference to an unintelligent cause-effect-relation. We are only familiar with two-way causality when intentionality and intelligence is involved. We see this everywhere in human life. For instance, a house is the cause of the money received in rent; but, at the same time, the anticipation of rental was the cause of its being built. The relationship between unintelligent cause-effect relations and intelligent cause-effect relations in an irreducibly complex system is that the relation between the parts in the system can be explained by unintelligent causes, but the system as a whole cannot. It can only be explained by the involvement of an intelligent cause. The irreducibly complex system is never explained in the biological sciences, but always presupposed.

To read the entire paper, please click here
To discuss the paper, please click here

[ 12. November 2002, 18:28: Message edited by: Moderator ]

IP: Logged


All times are East Coast  
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    Top Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | ISCID

All content © ISCID and content contributor 2001-2003

The ISCID Forums are aimed at generating insight into the nature of complex systems (e.g. biological complexity, organizational complexity, etc.) and the ontological status of purpose, especially from the vantage point of various information- and design-theoretic models.

Indexed by UBB Spider Hack  |  Powered by Infopop Corporation UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.1

PCID | Encyclopedia | Brainstorms | The Archive | News | Essay Contests | Chat Events | Membership