ISCID Forums


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» ISCID Forums   » General   » The Archive   » Jakob Wolf: The Intelligent Design Theory and the Rehabilitation of Analogical ...

   
Author Topic: Jakob Wolf: The Intelligent Design Theory and the Rehabilitation of Analogical ...
Moderator
Administrator
Member # 1

Icon 1 posted 23. September 2003 10:37      Profile for Moderator   Email Moderator   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Intelligent Design Theory and the Rehabilitation of Analogical Knowledge

by Jakob Wolf

ABSTRACT—The purpose of this essay is to argue that the Intelligent Design theory is not a theory in natural science, but it is still a valid form of reasoning and essential to the proper understanding of nature. Intelligent Design theory is natural science as far as it scrutinizes the scope of the Darwinian mechanism. But in its core Intelligent Design theory is not a theory in natural science, because the assertion that only an intelligent cause can explain the evolution of central biological systems is based on analogical knowledge. It is based on the analogy of a biological system and a man-made machine. The fact that Intelligent Design theory is based on an analogical mode of cognition disqualifies the theory as a theory in natural science, because theories in natural science are based on a causal mode of cognition, but it does not disqualify it as such. There are good arguments supporting the theory. Especially Kant and the phaenomenological philosophy underpin Intelligent Design theory by showing that analogical reasoning is no mere option. The fact that an irreducibly complex system resembles a man-made machine is no subjective arbitrary observation but a non-optional shared cognition. Intelligent Design theory should not replace Darwinism as a theory in natural science; it should replace Darwinism as a naturalistic ideology. Darwinism becomes a naturalistic ideology when it becomes a belief that the Darwinistic mechanism some day will be able to explain biological systems, which Intelligent Design theory has described as being irreducibly complex. The assertion that these biological systems can only be explained by an intelligent cause is better founded, than the Darwinian ideology. The central motive of Intelligent Design theory is to criticise the Darwinian naturalistic ideology. But the effectiveness of this challenge does not depend on the formulation of Intelligent Design theory as a theory in natural science.

To read the entire paper, please click here

IP: Logged


All times are East Coast  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    Top Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | ISCID

All content © ISCID and content contributor 2001-2003

The ISCID Forums are aimed at generating insight into the nature of complex systems (e.g. biological complexity, organizational complexity, etc.) and the ontological status of purpose, especially from the vantage point of various information- and design-theoretic models.

Indexed by UBB Spider Hack  |  Powered by Infopop Corporation UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.1

PCID | Encyclopedia | Brainstorms | The Archive | News | Essay Contests | Chat Events | Membership