ISCID Forums


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» ISCID Forums   » General   » Brainstorms   » Vertosick's "The Genius Within"

   
Author Topic: Vertosick's "The Genius Within"
James A. Barham
Member
Member # 50

Icon 1 posted 12. June 2002 08:17      Profile for James A. Barham   Email James A. Barham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It seems that third-force "neo-vitalism" has gone mainstream!

I wanted to draw everyone's attention to a new book by Frank T. Vertosick, Jr., called "The Genius Within: Discovering the Intelligence of Every Living Thing" (Harcourt, 2002).

Vertosick is a neurosurgeon, and the book has no scholarly apparatus, but he has clearly read widely and his argument is grounded in empirical facts all along the way. Here is his main thesis, in a nutshell:

"Scientists must either accept the genius [i.e., intelligence] of the living world or attribute the existence of life entirely to Divine Design. There is no middle ground. Mainstream evolutionists give us a false choice: the world was created either by an intelligent God or by unintelligent Chance. I would offer a third alternative: life was indeed created by intelligent design, but the design is entirely of earthly origin." (p. 8).

I have only skimmed the book so far, but it seems to be mainly based on network concepts, that we were recently discussing on another thread.

It appears quite shallow philosophically, with the author sometimes making strong critiques of the mainstream Darwinian position, and sometimes embracing it uncritically. Likewise, with respect to mutliple realizability.

Nevertheless, I believe it is significant that the basic idea that Life = Intelligence is now out there in the mainstream pop science literature. This is certainly a positive development.

[ 12 June 2002, 08:18: Message edited by: James A. Barham ]

IP: Logged
molad
Member
Member # 957

Icon 1 posted 24. October 2003 19:15      Profile for molad   Email molad   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
?The common Amoeba has a naked cell surface, but a variety of shelled forms exists; the genus Difflugia, for example, constructs a case from minute grains of sand, whereas other amebae secrete intricate shells of calcium carbonate and silica. These shells contain holes through which the pseudopodium can be extruded to collect food particles.?

Another author: ?In Diflugia, the shell is made of tiny sand grains cemented together in a kind of miniature upside-down vase. In Arcella, the shell is constructed from a protein-sugar compound called chitin.?

The same scheme carried out by a variety of methods in a variety of materials. It sure looks like pre-cranial brain intelligence. I seem to have arrived at Vertosick?s conclusion (in an even smaller nutshell: ?... life and intelligence ... aren?t separable entities, in my opinion?) from a different point.

What is ?multiple realiizability??

Tim Reynolds
Long Beach CA

IP: Logged


All times are East Coast  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    Top Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | ISCID

All content © ISCID and content contributor 2001-2003

The ISCID Forums are aimed at generating insight into the nature of complex systems (e.g. biological complexity, organizational complexity, etc.) and the ontological status of purpose, especially from the vantage point of various information- and design-theoretic models.

Indexed by UBB Spider Hack  |  Powered by Infopop Corporation UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.1

PCID | Encyclopedia | Brainstorms | The Archive | News | Essay Contests | Chat Events | Membership