|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 29. December 2008 05:36
John,
Well then, here we are.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 29. December 2008 10:55
My end is a damn sight closer than yours is. You must be pretty hard up all of a sudden to be lowering yourself to talking to me. Can't you find something better to do with your life?
Until you answer my questions I'll just have to pretend you don't exist.
Ciao
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 29. December 2008, 10:57: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 30. December 2008 06:44
John,
It's a free country so you can pretend I don't exist if you so desire. I will pretend that you will continue to read every word I write here.
I don't owe you answers about Uncommon Descent or my involvement with it. To put it bluntly that's none of your business. However, by way of demonstration, the following should answer some of your questions:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/humor/holiday-humor/
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 30. December 2008 13:13
Sounds good to me but you are dead wrong about AGW and so are all your hand picked sources.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 30. December 2008 17:10
By the way Springer, it is very much my business as is every other weblog that has to ban all those that disagree with its blogczar rulers like yourself.
It is pretty obvious that David "I love being right" Springer is once again in complete charge of Uncommon Descent. He has deliberately defied Barry Arrington's ban on the discussion of global warming and is once again dominating every discussion with his arrogant ways. It is no wonder Dembski abandoned Uncommon Descent. He never really had any control over it. Arrington doesn't either.
[ 01. January 2009, 17:40: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 01. January 2009 09:12
http://ravingatheists.com/forum/showthread.php?p=535432#post535432
Please note that Alan Fox has joined the rest of the TRASH above. Unfortunately, both for him and for Raving Atheists, I have abandoned any further attempt to reason with intellectual TRASH.
TRASH - American Heritage Dictionary, definition # 4 -
"A person or group of people regarded as worthless or contemptible."
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. davison
IP: Logged
|
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 01. January 2009 09:15
Dear John,
You're projecting.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 01. January 2009 17:38
David "The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away" Springer I presume. (King James version)
I have no idea what "projection" means. It is a favorite expression used at "groupthinktanks" like Pharyngula, Pharyngula, EvC and After The Bar Closes. I am surprised to hear "the one" use it. It makes absolutely no sense to me. Maybe Springer could explain but I wouldn't bet on it. He will probably just submerge again to gloat over some imagined conquest.
Incidentally, speaking of banishment, below is a weblog that refuses to allow me to unsubscribe from their membership, unlike Uncommon Descent, where I have been banished three times, twice by David "I love being right" Springer.
http://ravingatheists.com/forum/showthread.php?p=535540#post535540
It is hard to believe isn't it?
Not any longer it isn't!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 01. January 2009 20:22
Dear John,
Description of Projection
You called Alan Fox intellectual trash. I accused you of projection. Connect the dots.
So why do you participate in blogs where you're subjected to ridicule and abuse?
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. January 2009 06:10
Thanks for asking.
I participate in blogs because I am supremely confident of my position, a position I share with my predecessors, not one of whom was a raving atheist, a religious fanatic or a pompous domineering, bloward like Richard Dawkins, Paul Zachary Myers, Wesley Elsberry and of course David "I love being right" Springer.
I believe wth Robert Broom that there WAS a Plan. I further believe that the plan has been completed with the present biota which is disappearing at an alarming rate, never to be replaced. It is very likely that there is not left on earth a single organism capable of creative evolution.
Just what is the likelihood that I could get this thesis published in a reputable peer reviewed journal? That is why I have a blog and why I am delighted to absorb abuse from a confessed sociopath like yourself. The others I have mentioned are terrified of me just as their atheist Darwinian predecessors were terrified of my distinguished sources.
You made me an enemy long ago. You worked at it. The only difference between you and the others I have singled out is that you are willing to mention my name, although always with your characteristic snide style. Why don't you expose me at Uncommon Descent where you reign supreme? You already ridiculed me there once, knowing I could not respond.
I hope that helps.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 04. January 2009 10:50
This is for Springer.
Did you ever notice that they hardly ever mention me or my sources at After The Bar Closes, while they have whole threads dedicated to Dembski, O'Leary, Uncommon Descent and especially DaveScot on whom they heap abuse with great abandon? I think it is hilarious for you to ask me why I enjoy abuse when you get vastly more of it than I do.
Now let me explain why they keep their filthy traps shut about me as they gleefully dump on you and your elitist cronies at UD. It is because they are afraid of me, that's why. So are Myers and Dawkins. Who is afraid of the biggest bully that ever lived - David "I love being right" Springer? Who is afraid of a forum that postulates "non-material forces"? Nobody that I know, not I, not even Wesley Elsberry. UD has lost all credibility largely because of you. You are a hypocrite because you don't believe in non-material forces yourself. As far as I can tell from some of your recent comments, you have undergone some sort of epiphany and joined forces with the atheist Darwinians. You can't have it both ways Springer. You can't believe in a programmed evolution and at the same time deny a role for the supernatural. Programs HAD programmers just like watches HAD watchmakers. First causes are not to be denied. Got that? Write that down.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 04. January 2009, 10:55: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
