|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 15. December 2006 07:43
I hate to repeat myself so I invite everyone to visit alanfox.blogspot.com/ where he as created a thread just for me. EvC did the same thing with the supreme confidence that they would expose the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis as a miserable failure. It is my opinion that both of these ventures have failed.
What is remarkable is that the Darwinian myth has persisted for almost a century and a half without ever receiving a scintilla of experimental verification, that without which no hypotheis can survive. Darwinism should have died late in the nineteenth century at about the same time as the Ether of Physics was disproved and for precisely the same reasons. Like the Ether of Physics, the generation of new species through selection had also failed the acid test which must always be applied to every hypothesis, the application of an unambiguous scientific examination. The Darwinian myth has survived simply because it is the only hypthesis acceptable to a mentality which is congenitally incapable of recognizing that there was a purpose in the design of the universe. It has been nothing more than a sustained one hundred and fifty years of mass hysteria.
"The one thing we learn from history is that we do not learn from history."
Anonymous?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 15. December 2006, 18:44: Message edited by: John A. Davison ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 15. December 2006 19:23
John,
you are right. Dont worry about darwinists.
Your Manifesto is exceptional. Having hard time on antievolution.org I believe you.
Its a pitty nobody here underestand Czech language. The nowadays greatest living Czech scientist professor Neubaurer from Charles University Prague (many biological articles publicized wordlwide) turn to be strong anti-darwinst and there is no opponent to him in Central Europe. He accepted goethian-nietzsches view of life and he ridicules darwinism very.
Some of professr Zdenek Neubaers scientifical works:
.
.
.
Neubauer, Závada: The capacity of the bacterial host for the reproduction of the RNA phage f2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comms. (1965) 20:1.
Závada, Fikotová, Koutecká, Neubauer, Rašková: The capacity of the bacterial host for the reproduction of the RNA phage f2. II. Its UV-sensitivity in 5-BU labeled host and the effect of the thymineless death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. (1966) 22:480
Neubauer: A brief consideration on the meaning of the lysogenic conversion. Nature (1967) 213:1263
Neubauer, Závada: The Relation between the RNA phage and the Chromosome of its host. IX. International Congress for Microbiology, Moscow 1966, p. 471.
Liebl, Neubauer, Bejšovcová, Strnadová: Microbial ribosomes with enzymes and model systems. IX.International Congress for Microbiology, Moscow 1966., p. 11
Neubauer: A model concerning the early functions in lambda bacteriophage. Lysogeny Workshop Sorrento 1968 - Phage Information Service.
Calef, Neubauer: Immunity regulation in defective lysogens. Lysogeny Workshop Sorrento 1968 - Phage Information Service.
Calef, Neubauer: Active and inactive states of the cI gene in some lambda defective phages. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 1968, XXXIII:765.
Calef, Neubauer: Active-inactive phase variation in cI gene of lambda prophage. Symposium on Modern Genetics; Hong-Kong 1968, p. 211.
Oppenheim, Neubauer, Calef, Antirepressor: A new element in genetical regulation. Nature (1970) 226:31
Neubauer, Calef: Imunity phase-shift in defective lysogenes. J. Mol. Biol. (1970) 51:1-13.
Neubauer: Prophage deletions selected by heat induction of bacteria lysogenic for lambda int6cI857. Virology (1970) 42:225.
Závada, Neubauer: Lysogenie - profág jako episom. Zprávy z epidemiologie a mikrobiologie. (1971) 13:23.
Calef, Avitabile, Marchelli, Neubauer, Soller: The Genetics of the Anti-Immune phenotype of defective lambda lysogens. The Lambda Symposium. Cold Spring Harbor Press 1971, p. 619.
Neubauer: Prophage mutants unable to kill the host upon induction. IX. výroč. sjezd čsl. spol. mikrobiol., Smokovec 1971
Neubauer: Regulace regulátorových genů v systému ranných funkcí profága Lambda. Acta hygienica, epidemiol. et microbiol., Příloha č. X, p. 1. Praha 1971.
Neubauer, Závada: Bakteriofág lambda jako nástroj genetické a regulační analysy. Bulletin čsl. spol. mikrobiol. (1972) 12:2, pp. 20-23.
Špelina, Neubauer: Role cIII produktu a antiimmunity při zygotické indukci profága lambda. X. výroční sjezd čsl. spol. mikrobiol., Brno 1972, p. 1-45.
Koutecká, Neubauer: Stadium variability lysogenních kmenů přižívajících tepelnou indukci. Ibid., p. 146.
Závada, Neubauer: Bakteriofág jako modelový systém. Ibid., pp. 117-136.
Hampacherová, Koutecká, Neubauer: Two repressors in bacteriophage lambda. Molec. gen. Genetics (1973) 120:133-137.
Hampacherová, Koutecká, Neubauer: Two repressors of bacteriophage lambda: Immunity and Anti-immunity. Folia microb. (1973) 18:187.
Špelina, Neubauer: The role of the cIII product and antiimmunity in the zygotic induction of lambda. Folia microb. (1973) 18:187.
Závada, Neubauer, Koutecká, Krekulová, Špelina, Hampacherová, Vihanová, Virové funkce v lysogenním systému a jejich regulace. Zpráva o výsledcích dosažených při řešení dílčího úkolu V-3-2-9, Praha 1973.
Vihanová, Neubauer: Phage and prophage decision in defective Lambda lysogens: the role of cII product. Molec. gen. Genet. (1973) 122:367.
Špelina, Neubauer, Závada, The role of cIII product and anti-immunity in zygotic induction of bacteriophage lambda. Molec. gen. Genet. (1973) 123:355.
Koutecká, Ciryn, Neubauer: Phenotype variability in a lysogen carrying a heat inducible prophage lambda. Molec. gen. Genet. (1973) 125:359.
Calef, Avitabile, del Giudice, Marchelli, Menna, Neubauer, Soller: The Genetics of the Anti-immune Phenotype of defective Lambda Lysogens. The Bacteriophace Lambda, A. D. Hershey ed., Cold Spring Harbor Lab., New York 197l, pp. 609-620.
Neubauer, Koutecká, Alternující regulační obvody a diferenciace buněčných populací. Biol. Listy (1974) 39:57-61.
Vihanová, Neubauer: Odstranění a obnovení imunity po UV ozáření lysogenů a role cII produktu. 11. výr. sjezd Čsl. spol. mikrobiol. (1974), p. 187.
Koutecká, Neubauer: Řízené genové aktivity - vymezení pojmů. Biol. Listy (1974) 39:116.
Neubauer: Sdružená resistence na antibiotika a její teoretický význam. Bulletin Čs. společnosti mikrobiol. při ČSAV, 19-27 (1973).
Cirýn, Koutecká, Neubauer: Non-mutational hereditary changes of prophage lambda gene activity in non-defective lysogens. Folia microbiol. 20 (l), p. 94-95, 1975.
Vihanová, Neubauer: Differentiation in UV irradiated bacteria lysogenic for a defective prophage and the role of the cII gene in this process. Folia microbiol. 20 (1), p.95 (1975)
Neubauer, Bendová, Benda: An Attempt to describe regulation of lambda bacteriophage by means of situation calculus. Folia microbiol
.
.
.
[ 15. December 2006, 20:19: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 15. December 2006 20:28
Professor Neubauer:
Purpose & comp. belong to the category of inner relationships to the whole (innere Beziehungen zur Ganzheit in German, vnitřní vztahy k celkovosti in Czech): primarily, they refer to the subject-being of such relations—an organism, an individual life, an evolving species, a language. The subject-matter of its purpose, meaning, and intention is a particular expression of a being, or rather of its being—being one, good, true—that is: of 'being itself' an actualization of its 'self'.
More on:
http://www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/neub.htm#71
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 16. December 2006 07:01
Thank you very much Martin. As has always been typical, critics of the Darwinian myth simply do not exist.
Alan Fox has invited the rest of his cronies at "After The Bar Closes" over to his blog
alanfox.blogspot.com/
so that I can respond there to their insults and denigration of myself and Martin. It is decent of Alan to do this and I have the sense that he is beginning to agree that the Darwinian fairy tale is without foundation. I can see no other reason for this action. Why else would he offer the thread "John Davison this is for you" in the first place? It tallies 156 comments at present and God only knows how many views.
I predict his cronies will not show. Ideologues are like that. I also predict that Panda's Thumb is not long for this world and neither is Uncommon Descent, ARN, EvC and Pharyngula, all for the same basic reason. Forums that must ban their critics are little more than mutual admiration societies. Many scientific journals suffer from the same intellectual malaise. It is a transparent indication of insecurity.
"Brainstorms" remains a notable exception. Those of us who are allowed to post here, like myself, are grateful.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 17. December 2006 16:46
Martin
Please transmit to the animals at "After The Bar Closes" with my compliments:
"Natural selection is a real factor in connection with mimicry, but its function is to conserve and render preponderant an ALREADY EXISTENT LIKENESS, not to build up that likeness through the accumulation of small variations as is so generally assumed."
Reginald C. Punnett, Mimicry in Butterflies, page 152, my emphasis.
In other words - in complete accord with the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis.
Thank you. I will look for it.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 20. December 2006 16:16
I see that the blocked message descends once again when I attempt to respond to Arden Chatfield at alanfox.blogspot.com/ on the thread "John Davison, this is for you." Who do you think you are kidding Alan? Is that what is for me, denying me the opportunity to respond on my own thread? Apparently!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 20. December 2006 19:29
Listen to this folks.
Occam's After Shave (how is that for a cowardly alias) is now claiming that I have reversed my position and am now saying that evolution is going on. That is a flaming lie. I have repeatedly joined with both Robert Broom and Julian Huxley in agreeing that a new Genus has not appeared in two million years. Grasse too suggested as much. I have further extended that to claim that a new experimentally verified true species has not appeared in historical times, a position I still hold. As is typical, the Darwinians must resort to flagrant lies to preserve their foolish paradigm, the most failed hypothesis in the history of science.
It is sad that I must respond here since they have made it impossible for me to respond in their own venue. Cowardly ideologues are like that of whatever persuasion, whether it be atheist Darwinism or Protestant Fundamentalism. Once someone is banned, no further comments about that person should be emanating from a source that practices such tactics. That is the height of cowardice and ethical malfeasance.
What does Occam's After Shave think I mean with my signature?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 21. December 2006 00:47
John,
hehe.I am banned at antievolution.org.
"Your posting permissions have been removed.
You are currently logged in as VMartin."
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 21. December 2006 07:20
Martin
Well I am not surprised and of course my congratulations. Please continue with me at
alanfox.blogspot.com/
a "neutral venue" according to Alan Fox.
They are still convinced we are the same person. They seem to think that they "tricked" me into admitting it.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 21. December 2006 10:50
Here is the verbatim official word from After The Bar Closes.
"There can't POSSIBLY be **two** people as nutty as JAD."
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Richard Oldani
Member
Member # 2606
|
posted 21. December 2006 11:33
John, you said,
quote:
I have repeatedly joined with both Robert Broom and Julian Huxley in agreeing that a new Genus has not appeared in two million years.
Is it your position then that before single cells appeared evolution was not occurring? That present day extinctions are not evolutionary in nature? That changes in human populations occurring all over the world are not due to some kind of evolutionary pressures? In other words, is it your position that only saltations count as evolution?
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 21. December 2006 12:24
None of the things you mention have anything to do with evolution which as near as I can determine is no longer in progress. What do you think my signature means? As to the mechanism which was involved, like ontogeny it was predetermined and took place independent of the environment. I hope this helps.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 21. December 2006 13:54
John,
I am still banned. It is ridiculous. Darwinists claims on butterfly mimicry are really funny. But I have no access any more to "discuss" with them.
I would like to know why mimicry evolved only in some species, when in the the same area live and thrive non-mimetic butterfly species as well. Perhaps in non-mimetic butterfly species small gradual random mutations leading to mimicry did not occur at all, hehe?
[ 21. December 2006, 13:57: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 21. December 2006 14:06
The official word from After The Bar Closes was from none other than "Dr Rev" Lenny Flank. Don't take my word for it. Visit ATBC.
Martin
I am sure that Alan Fox won't ban you from his "neutral venue." Join me there in laughing at the Darwinian mystics. It is great sport. If he bans you let me know.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
