|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 22. February 2007 06:06
Analyses of the genetic makeup of adult organisms are meaningless. They only show what is left after all the alternatives have been shut off which is exactly what embryonic differentiation involves, the progressive elimination of alternatives. That, by the way, is exactly how a taxonomic key operates as well.
I predict that the expressed gene diversity in embryos will always prove to be much greater than it is in the adults which those embryos become. It WAS the changes in embryonic pathways that DETERMINED evolutionary progress, a progress no longer in effect.
It is no accident that it is the planula larva of Acropora that displays the presence of vertebrate gene families. I am willing to bet those gene families will NOT be found in the adult Acropora polyp.
The presence of vertebrate gene families in the embryos of one of the most primitive animal phyla is direct evidence for the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis. Just as evolution has involved the loss of potentiality, so does the ontogeny of every creature involve the same. The place to look for the answers is in the embryos, not in the adults.
The only changes that occurred that led to evolutionary progress WERE alterations in the expression of embryonic processes. What we see in the adult is but a small fraction of what WAS involved. Besides I see no evidence that evolution is even going on any more. Neither does anyone else. They just think they do!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 23. February 2007 06:16
Quick
Rush over to P.Z. Meyers "Pharngula" form and read post #32 on the First Molly Award thread before he disemvowels it.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 23. February 2007 10:56
Here is the disemvoweled version. Post #32
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/02/and_the_winner_of_the_first_mo.php
Here is the original message verbatim -
Dear P.Z. Meyers
Thank you for separating me from the rest of your disinguished contributors by disemvoweling my comments. Any form of attention is greatly appreciated.
Here is another opportunity to prove that you are a "prescribed," "born that way," homozygous atheist, totally oblivious to that which was obvious to Albert Einstein -
"Everything is determined...by forces over which we have no control."
and to Leo Berg -
"Evolution is in a great measure an unfolding of pre-existimg rudiments."
Nomogenesis, page 406
and to Pierre Grasse -
"Any system which purports to account for evolution must invoke a mechanism not mutational or aleatory."
Evolution of Living Organsims, page 245
and to Otto Schindewolf -
"...the main features of the evolutionary trend were laid out right from the start."
Basic Questions in Paleontology, page 360 -
in other words, all in complete accord with the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 24. February 2007 06:16
Isn't it revealing that P.Z. Meyers has found it necessary to disemvowel not just the comments of John A. Davison, but those of Albert Einstein, Leo Berg, Otto Schindewolf and Pierre Grasse as well? That is the reason that I decided recently to let others speak for me, thereby placing the responsibility of my critics squarely on their own pathetic shoulders.
Like his declared idol, Richard Dawkins, Meyers has now openly dismissed the shared and largely independent conclusions of some of the finest minds of the past in a desperate, last ditch attempt to preserve the atheist Darwinian fairy tale.
All I can say is -
It is hard to believe isn't it?
and
I love it so!
I also invite both Meyers and Dawkins to respond here at "brainstorms," confident that they will not. "Prescribed" Ideologues are like that wherever you find them.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 24. February 2007 15:16
I hope others will join with me by inviting Dawkins to participate here at "brainstorms."
His email address is -
richard.dawkins@new.ox.ac.uk
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 24. February 2007 15:42
The following comes under the category "unbelievable."
The entire thread at Pharyngula on which my messages were disemvoweled no longer exists and cannot be found in the February Archives. This is an old story. Neither I nor my sources are allowed to exist by the atheist Darwinian establishment and not by the Christian Fundamentalist establishment either.
It doesn't get any better than this.
Naturally -
I love it so!
"Conscience doth make cowards of THEM all."
after Shakespeare
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 25. February 2007 00:59
The Pharyngula thread has magically returned. As my mother used to say -
"The squeeky wheel gets the grease."
We will never know what would have happened had I not complained.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 25. February 2007 05:29
Martin
Thank you for your support at Pharyngula. I doubt you will be allowed to continue. Ideologues of all persuasions are like that.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 25. February 2007 07:51
I address this directly to Meyers whose logo, proudly displayed, is -
"Evolution, development and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal."
What do you intend to do with Martin, disemvowel him or, as you have done with me, muzzle him entirely? Incidentally, any fool can reconstruct your infantile disemvowelizations, especially when I have provided a pony as I recently did at "brainstorms." I recommend you ban him too.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 25. February 2007 13:08
I would call it not only "biological ejaculations" but also "drunkard vomiting". Some articles show that folks there don't have basic background in history of religion. Citing parts of Old Testament and identifying judaism with christianity is something that is really interesting.
"The story of Jephthah from Judges 11:29-40 is a good reason to abandon that Judeo-Christian vileness."
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/02/the_story_of_jephthah_is_reaso.php
I am curious if my response there will be without vowels after while.
I see some similarity between unfolding of religious thinking and unfolding of life forms during evolution. Both processes are predetermined.
[ 25. February 2007, 13:46: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 25. February 2007 15:47
Martin
Don't let them off the hook. You have them on the run. Meyers can't keep banning and disemvoweling EVERYONE with whom he disagrees. No blogmaster or forum sponsor can if he expects to command any degree of respect. Bannishment, deletion and disemvowelization are all the perfect demonstrations of insecurity, egomania and intellectual cowardice. Force Meyers to continue to display his real colors. Better yet, invite him here as I have done. Neither he nor his hero, Richard Dawkins, will ever show of course. That is the proof of the pudding!
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
John A. Davison
Member
Member # 1425
|
posted 27. February 2007 00:52
I see that the the thread "And the winner of the first Molly Award is" -
no longer exists once again at Pharygula. That is the thread where my comments were disemvoweled. Martin has now also been disemvoweled. I book marked that thread in case anyone wants to recover what was presented there. Let us see if Meyers will replace it now that he has been once again exposed.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
Incidentally, Jason Rennie in Australia, the producer of the SCIPHISHOW plans to interview me this Saturday. His interviews are presented verbatim in audio but not written form. I am looking forward to this opportunity to present my evolutionary conclusions as well as those of my sources, and also as an opportunity to comment on those forums which have found it necessary to ban us from speaking, forums such as EvC, Panda's Thumb, Pharyngula and Uncommon Descent. "Brainstorms" seems to be our only venue left. The "we" to which I refer includes six of the greatest biological minds of all time, not one of whom was either a Darwinian mystic or a religious zealot. Together we have produced the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis, a new hypothesis for organic change, an achievement long overdue.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 27. February 2007 13:48
I have been banned on Pharyngula forum by great atheistic "scientist" EZ Myers. He used there old darwinistic tactic (from ATBC - they even recommend him to do so) - he hold me for John Davison's sockpuppet. Again. These illiterate darwinistic atheists have never heard about directed evolution, orthogenesis etc. So they consider all proponets of the idea to be John Davison himself. They are even unable (no wonder, they are just darwinistic simpletons) to check my IP adress. They do not realize that it is from Europe. They are unable to chcek from IP its location.
So no wonder we have to deal with simpletons par excellence who use only coarse abuses and ban their oponents. That's all they know.
Shame on "Pharyngula" darwinists.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/02/the_false_equation.php
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 27. February 2007 18:05
Some darwinists seems to be satiffied that I am now banned on "Pharyngula". Whatever faking reason seems to be good for them.
But I suspect them that they use "Pharyngula" as some kind of psycho-therapy for neodarwinism-obsessed. They don't like to be disturbed while they are climbing mount of Dawkin's nonsenses improbable.
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 28. February 2007 01:08
Yesterday I posted on Pharyngula following post that was completely deleted subsequently. But as far as I can block their Pharyngula cookies on my PC I don't see possibility how they can block me to re-post it whenever I like. Of course they can block arriving posts from IP of my inet-provider. But there are lot of available proxies nowadays.
quote:
I was banned under pretext me to be John Davison. This pretext is very funny because owner of this blog should be able at least to check my IP address and find out the location of my provider. This is very simple and every student at high school know how to do it. Owner of this blog should know that my provider is in Slovakia and consequently I am not professor John Davison from Vermont in USA.
If the owner of this blog doesn't like my antidarwinistic opinions he should write it directly. He shouldn't use the same lies like morons on ATBC forum who banned me under the pretext that I am professor John Davison. I am not John Davison, that's the lie.
If the owner of this blog doen't like my antidarwinistic posts here he should express it clearly and ban me without using childish pretext.
But in that case owner of this blog shouldn't call himself "liberal". Such proceeding like here has nothing common with liberal approach at all.
[ 28. February 2007, 01:37: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
