|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 27. April 2007 03:52
http://oneblogaday.com/web/2007/04/15/pharyngula-evolution-development-and-random-biological-ejaculations/
Martin and I are still able to post at the above site which has now reached nearly 300 revealing messages. The star and author of the thread, P.Z. Meyers remains silent which is characteristc of bullies when not secure in their own venue. To save space and my cramping fingers I refer all to my message # 298 as I feel it is pertinent to the present state of the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. May 2007 16:21
Martin
As I predicted, Meyers has again purged the entire thread where we last were discussed. I can't find it. I also am unable to search the Archives beyond a certain point. Perhaps others can. It is the same old Darwinian ploy. Their critics are not allowed to exist. They don't dare let them exist. How very revealing it really is!
"Conscience doth make cowards of THEM all."
after Shakespeare
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 04. May 2007 15:26
I hit on english translation of the Nietzsche's last work.
Atheist Nietzsche apparently ridiculed contemporary darwinism in his last work
Die Götzen-Dämmerung - Twilight of the Idols
http://www.handprint.com/SC/NIE/GotDamer.html
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti-Darwin. — As for the famous "struggle for existence," so far it seems to me to be asserted rather than proved. It occurs, but as an exception; the total appearance of life is not the extremity, not starvation, but rather riches, profusion, even absurd squandering — and where there is struggle, it is a struggle for power. One should not mistake Malthus for nature.
Assuming, however, that there is such a struggle for existence — and, indeed, it occurs — its result is unfortunately the opposite of what Darwin's school desires, and of what one might perhaps desire with them — namely, in favor of the strong, the privileged, the fortunate exceptions. The species do not grow in perfection: the weak prevail over the strong again and again, for they are the great majority — and they are also more intelligent. Darwin forgot the spirit (that is English!); the weak have more spirit. One must need spirit to acquire spirit; one loses it when one no longer needs it. Whoever has strength dispenses with the spirit ("Let it go!" they think in Germany today; "the Reich must still remain to us"). It will be noted that by "spirit" I mean care, patience, cunning, simulation, great self-control, and everything that is mimicry (the latter includes a great deal of so-called virtue).
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 05. May 2007 06:43
Thank you Martin for your unflagging support both here and below.
http://oneblogaday.com/web/2007/04/15/pharyngula-evolution-development-and-random-biological-ejaculations/
The thread dedicated by and to P.Z. Meyers has now reached 537 comments and should be read in its entirety by every serious student of the great mystery of organic evolution. It is an elegant demonstration of the continuing, never ending conflict between blind atheist ideology and the forces of reason and science. I have often said -
"It doesn't get any better than this."
But it DOES as the above thread proves.
The most remarkable and revealing feature of the thread is the conspicuous absence of its initiator and his idol Richard Dawkins across the pond. It is an old story. Critics of the Darwinian fantasy do not exist, must not exist and will not exist as long as they can successfully be ignored, muzzled, and denigrated by an establishment sadly still dominated by those who cannot hear what Einstein called the "Music of the Spheres."
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 05. May 2007 16:48
Well Martin, it looks as if they have finally muzzled me as my last several messages have not appeared. How about you? I gave them until 7 PM Eastern to show them. If they don't, I am history as one more flame blog bites the dust. It will be nothing without us, just like Alan Fox's "neutral venue."
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. May 2007 15:16
I am back on there. It seems they delete just certain posts.
Let me take this opportunty to ask someone who is permitted to please introduce a thread on global warming as I have some interesting calculations to present.
Thank you in advance.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. May 2007 23:17
http://oneblogaday.com/web/2007/04/15/pharyngula-evolution-development-and-random-biological-ejaculations/
This thread has now generated 570 messages and seems finally to be slowing some. I recommend it as a reminder that the battle still rages for the control of men's minds. Was intelligence an "evolutionary accident" as Stephen J. Gould maintained or are we the final products of a Plan as proposed by Robert Broom? I feel the above thread will help resolve that question. Its most remarkable feature is the complete absence of the man who proudly and arrogantly initiated it.
I feel that the substance of this thread presents a conquest of the forces of reason over those who, like P.Z. Meyers and Richard Dawkins, still support the most failed hypothesis in the history of science. I am very grateful for the invaluable assistance of Martin in achieving that end.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 08. May 2007, 10:19: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 11. May 2007 12:43
Oxfords pundits ridiculed Giordano Bruno because of his teaching on solar system. Giordano Bruno had no mercy with them and denigrated them in his famous work "Cena delle ceneri".
Darwinists do not like hear that their spokesman Dawkins - in mentioned connection - is Oxford pundit too.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 11. May 2007 14:22
The primary and perhaps only reason that Darwinism has survived is because its most ardent and influential spokespersons have been associated with some of our most respected institutions, Harvard, Oxford and Cornell.
If Louis Agassiz, who founded Harvard's Museum of Comparative Zoology, could know what has happened there in recent times, he would be tossing in his grave.
"Study Nature not books."
Louis Agassiz
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 11. May 2007, 14:23: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 13. May 2007 14:51
My latest post at One blog a day has been intercepted. Is it possible that darwinists there may denigrate there John and me however they like but we shall obey the rule of politeness and corectness?
Anyway Darwinism is like Ptolemaism. It's demise is inevitable. Sometimes it takes lot of time of course.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 13. May 2007 19:42
http://oneblogaday.com/web/2007/04/15/pharyngula-evolution-development-and-random-biological-ejaculations/
So have mine Martin. After over 600 messages the management there, anonymous of course, has decided that we no longer exist as it lets the dregs of the internet go on insulting us while we are unable to respond. It is After The Bar Closes, Alan Fox's "Neutral Venue" and Pharyngula all over again. It is beautiful! Rejoice!
One thing is for certain. In our absence it will soon disappear into oblivion as just one more example of the conquest of reason over the forces of evil. We came, we saw and we conquered. That is why we had to be banned.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
