|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 26. June 2007 19:22
Return to the above to discover that Elsberry, posting as VMartin, is threatening to ban him if he refers to me again. You see one cannot even refer to a banned poster if one expects to survive in Elsberry's inner sanctum, the Alamo of Darwinian mysticism.
It really doesn't get any better than this.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
Naturally, I love it so!
Congratulations Wesley. You are a real man and just proved it beyond any doubt.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 27. June 2007 05:01
Actually it is only Davison that MUST NOT be mentioned. It is perfectly acceptable to ridicule Davescot (David Springer), William Dembski, Michael Behe, Phillip Johnson, Jonathan Wells or any other member of the so called "ID movement." Of course they don't mention Davison either. I no longer wonder why.
Naturally,
I love it so!
It doesn't get any better than this.
"Conscience doth make cowards of them all."
after Shakespeare
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 28. June 2007 10:57
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=4683d65e889dfe28;act=ST;f=14;t=5054;st=180
I refer you specifically to the unbelievable post by Wesley Elsberry dated June 27 14:27. Can you imagine anything more base, more arrogant and more revealing about a person's lack of character than to threaten a contributor by introducing that threat in the contributor's own name? I for one cannot. What say others or will they, as usual, maintain the silence Martin and I have learned to expect? Do either of us exist even here at "brainstorms? Apparently not!
It is getting easy to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 29. June 2007 11:02
According to George Bernard Shaw -
"Silence is the most perfect expression of scorn."
So it would seem!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 29. June 2007, 11:02: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 30. June 2007 03:34
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46860e3e16792a2e;act=ST;f=14;t=5096;st=60
Martin is making mince meat out of the animals on this thread also which is why they are threatening to ban him. That is all they know how to do at blogs like Pharyngula, EvC, Dawkins Fan Club, Sandwalk and After The Bar Closes, just about the only surviving outposts of the most ridiculous proposal ever produced by the human imagination.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 01. July 2007 23:58
The bottom line is that Myers, Dawkins and Elsberry, congenital Darwinians all, have proven to be intellectual cowards, unwilling to defend their faith when openly challenged in the neutral arena which One Blog A Day has offered. I have invited them all here also. Where are they? We many critics of the biggest hoax in the history of science still do not exist. How much longer can this madness persist? Does anyone here at "brainstorms" have any answers? Apparently not!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 02. July 2007, 05:05: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 03. July 2007 15:00
Of course I invited them to come here - everybody would check their "arguments" at least. As far as I can judge many of them produce nothing more than denigrations. Some of them are masters in using abuses. If such behaviour is native to "knowledgeable evolutionist" I dare not say.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. July 2007 19:34
P.Z. Myers is one of them and he won't even respond on the thread that he so arrogantly initiated at One Blog A Day. The only comments other than by myself and Martin came from anonymous nothings like wOOt and Andrew who keep mindlessly declaring victory!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"Conscience doth make cowards of THEM all.
after Shakespeare.
Here we are Martin. Where are our adversaries? On the other hand where are our supporters? Nevertheless, we can laud one another, confident in Samuel Johnson's wisdom -
"The applause of a single human being is of great consequence."
Congratulations on exposing the animals at After The Bar Closes, "Elsberry's Alamo," his inner sanctum, "our forum" as the intellectual trash they have always been.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 04. July 2007 15:42
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=468bf9d35f95047a;act=ST;f=14;t=5054;st=240
Arden Chatfield, whoever that is, has asked Martin WHY evolution has stopped. Poor Chatfield has not yet learned the lesson that real scientists never ask the question WHY. They only ask HOW. THAT it has stopped was obvious to Robert Broom and, of all people, Julian Huxley as I have fully documented in the material which is the subject of this thread. No wonder the Darwinians ignore the firm conclusions of one of their own. They also ignore Dobzhanksy's demonstration that artificial selection is incompetent to transform the Darwinian's pet animal - Drosophila melanogaster.
It is perfectly obvious that Darwinians are quite incapable of considering that there was purpose in the evolution of life. Their problem is unquestionably genetic as the following indicates, based on the studies on separated identical twins.
"The twins might follow different faiths, but if one was religious, his or her twin more often than not was religious as well. Conversely when one was a nonbeliever, the other generally was too."..."Bouchard would later insist that while he and his colleagues had fully expected to find traits with a high degree of heritability, they also expected to find traits that had no genetic component. He was certain, he says, that they would find some traits that proved to be purely environmental. They were astonished when they did not."
William Wright, Born That Way, page 40.
So you see P.Z. Myers and Richard Dawkins are "prescribed," "born that way," "dyed-in-the-wool" atheists. There is nothing that can be done for them!
"EVERYTHING is determined... by forces over which we have no control."
Albert Einstein, my emphasis.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
