|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 06. July 2007 09:12
I see that Martin's comments are now being transferred to the Bathroom Wall at ATBC. That is exactly what they did to me as a preliminary to bannishment. Congratulations Elsberry on running a classy forum.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 06. July 2007 14:54
Of course AtBC is full of denigration and abuses. When I tried to pay with the same coin my post about Arden Chatfield was removed - oddly enough stupid responses from Arden Chatfield seems to be wellcommed.
Poor Arden Chatfield started pondering over my nationality in his latest posts. First he made some cute obvservations about East-European psychology, afterwards he adderssed my country and nationality more directly. He has made bold claims about Slovakian and English people. He seems to be seriously afflicted by darwinism to be short. I am afraid the poor Arden is suffering from the most virulent form of darwinism which gave rise to social darwinism and which was so misused by national-socialists.
The other guy there was afraid that my post could lead to "tumor" around it. People there seems to like the word "tumor" immediately. I am also a "nuissance" "nut" "stupid" "idiot" etc. for them.
I am waiting for some more cute comments using marxists or national-socialists vocabulary like "parasite" etc...
Check yourself if you like.
[ 06. July 2007, 15:06: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 06. July 2007 16:01
Martin
Be proud!
Join the club with me Martin and rejoice that you also have have brought out the worst in that herd of atheist, illiterate, unpublished, chance-worshipping, unfulfilled sociopaths. Panda's Pathetic Pollex is by far the most disgusting of the few surviving bastions of Darwinian mysticism. Elsberry even promotes the use of the F word now, at least in his "inner sanctum." "our forum," "After The Bar Closes" where his pathetic effete elite meet. What a herd of animals they really are! That is a sure sign of his desperation. He reached the bottom of his barrel when he threatened you posting with your name! Then he put the frosting on his own half-baked cake when he put your message in "The Bathroom Wall." What a loser!
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. July 2007 17:44
I am pleased to report that at
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=37148773&postID=3174377659203279209
I have not yet been banned and my message of July 7 5:50 AM has not yet elicited a response. Things are looking up! Richard Dawkins' days are numbered as a significant voice in the evolutionary scene.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 08. July 2007 00:03
Darwinists beeing in a crises formed two parts: Ultra-darwinists and Neutral-driftists. Now they discuss their issues and they pretend doing "science".
But what's most important is that both theories rest upon random mutation as the only primary source of evolutionary development. It reminds me of marxists and their "scientific " disputes.
[ 08. July 2007, 00:04: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. July 2007 04:56
"Marx, Darwin and Freud are the three most crashing bores in the Western World."
William Golding
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. July 2007 17:36
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=37148773&postID=3174377659203279209
Apparently I really reached Larry Moran at Sandwalk judging from both his defence of and his use of the F word in response to my comments.
Sandwalk incidentally is the name of a path at the Darwin estate which might explain his testiness.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable,a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. July 2007 22:27
The issues involved in the origin and subsequent evolution of life unfortunately have become largely dependent on the congenital tendencies with which we are all so obviously endowed. The major source of the present conflict is clearly related to the established fact that whether or not we believe in a Creator has a heritable component. The evidence for this has been summarized in William Wright's revealing book "Born That Way" and need not be further explained here. I accept what he has presented on face value, especially in view of the fact that what has been disclosed was not expected.
Today I see three major proponents of the atheist condition in the persons of Richard Dawkins, his New World surrogate P.Z. Myers, and Christopher Hitchens. All three have gone out of their way to arrogantly proclaim their philosophy to the world.
In researching the history of this remarkable state of affairs I discovered an interesting parallel in the writings of Thomas Henry Huxley, "Darwin's bulldog" and Albert Einstein, like myself, a strict determinist. It should be obvious that the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis is in complete accord with Einstein's -
"Everything is determined...by forces over which we have no control."
First from Thomas Henry Huxley -
"Of all the senseless babble I have ever had occasion to read, the demonstrations of these philosophers who undertake to tell us all about the nature of God would be the worst, if they were not surpassed by the still greater absurdities of the philosophers who try to prove that there is no God."
Henrietta A. Huxley, Aphorisms and Reflections From The Works of T.H. Huxley, page 3.
Compare this with -
"Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics and it springs from the same source... They are creatures who can't hear the music of the spheres."
Albert Einstein
The real issue is not whether there is or is not a God, something that can never be resolved anyway, but rather, is there any longer need for God, an entirely separate question and one definitely in need of further consideration.
Grasse wisely put it this way -
"Let us not invoke God in realities in which He NO LONGER HAS TO INTERVENE."
Evolution of Living Organisms, page 166, his emphasis, originally in italics.
I extend my cordial invitation to the atheist triumvirate of Hitchens, Dawkins and Myers (it sounds like a law firm doesn't it?) either to come here to defend their congenital atheism or invite me to an arena of their choice where I can present my equally congenital condition for all to enjoy whatever ones "prescribed," "born that way," "dyed-in-the-wool" tendencies may be. It is time we come to grips with what the real issues are with which we are faced. We are all victims in a determined universe. Some of us have been more fortunate than others.
"I'm an old campaigner and I love a good fight."
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
