|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 20. July 2007 11:40
Anyway guys at AtBC are very peculiar company. They use only denigrations, abuses and stupid questions as answers. One could make impression they are some experts and it is beyound their dignity to deal with you. In fact they are simpletons par excellence. When they wrote something about evolution you have to laugh. Now they see in dogs ongoing speciation. Never mind that dog can produce fertile offspring with wolf,
coyote, Ethiopian wolf and golden jackal.
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46a0da3a56df397c;act=ST;f=14;t=5054;st=300
After 30 minutes there are two responses to my post. Neither of them address any problem. Both are denigrations. Poor Arden Chatfield who suffers from darwinism and racism get his nervous attack and use lies like a hysterical woman.
[ 20. July 2007, 12:24: Message edited by: Martin ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 20. July 2007 23:36
As my only apparent ally I applaud you in your efforts. Sooner or later they will ban you once again. That is all that intellectual trash like Arden Chatfield know what to do when confronted with inescapable truth. Thank you for reminding them that we continue to call attention to their tactics here at "brainstorms." They will never show up here. Cowardly blowhards are like that wherever one finds them.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 21. July 2007 05:14
*ATTENTION* especially P.Z. Myers and Richard Dawkins. Don't forget to follow the action here
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46a1d69b9875e3e0;act=ST;f=14;t=5054;st=300
where Martin continues to dismantle the illiterati at Elsberry's "innner sanctum," "our forum," the "Alamo of Darwinian mysticism." It is just a matter of time before Elsberry bans him once again as Myers has already done. That is all that "prescribed" ideologues like Myers and Elsberry know what to do!
It doesn't get any better than this.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
Johh A. Davison
[ 21. July 2007, 05:15: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 21. July 2007 15:40
I received a threatening email from an "Ed" retpm@comcast.net
If anyone recognizes this email, please advise me through Private Message.
[ 21. July 2007, 15:44: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 25. July 2007 13:07
Thanks to Martin, I have been readmitted with full posting privileges at EvC.
"A past evoluition is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 27. July 2007 06:57
http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=19&t=465&m=205
Readmitted - 7/25/07 9:06 AM.
I managed to get in one significant message - 7/25/07 8:05 PM.
Banned 7/25/07 - 8:35 PM.
Thirty minutes of glory! That has to be a record!
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
iconasostacles
Member
Member # 5227
|
posted 27. July 2007 12:29
I have certainly not read carefully through every message in this thread. So I will, perhaps, be forgiven for concentrating my interest more directly on the initial posts that set it in motion.
Recently I have been observing these studies which detect partial species-variation within what we have traditionally classified as "one species." Researchers suspect that they will discover much more of this -- perhaps on a massively daunting scale.
It usually assuming that we are 'catching' the evolutionary vergence in action, i.e. observing the early stages of developmental bifurcation. It is also possible, though somewhat less likely, that our idea of "one species" consists of creatues that did not follow the same developmental path.
I would like to know if anyone has done any good thinking in this forum on the subject of species as bio-morphological "strange attractors"? I am aware that Wolfram's NKS theories are suggesting that living organisms are far less environmentally regulated than we might suppose and much more likely to "select" from the avaiable teleological options presented in complex pattern-space which is proximal to their current structural dynamics.
Is there anyone else thinking along these lines?
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 27. July 2007 19:05
The variations currently being recorded never had anything to do with creative evolution, a phenomenon of the distant past. I have published the reasons for this conclusion elsewhere so I will not repeat myself here.
There is not a shred of evidence that any living creature will ever become anything very different from what it is right now. Those who think otherwise, like Richard Dawkins, Wesley Elsberry, "Percy," whoever that is at EvC, and P.Z. Myers are each living in fantasy worlds which they have constructed all by themselves, oblivious to the undeniable testimony of both the fossil record and the experimental laboratory.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
iconasostacles
Member
Member # 5227
|
posted 27. July 2007 19:10
"Not a shred of evidence" is a fairly bold claim. I appreciate the solidity of your opinion. Thanks for the feedback.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 28. July 2007 05:18
You are very welcome.
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
