|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. August 2007 15:28
Martin
Thank you and that is precisely why I enjoy seeing them continue to ban me and, just as important, also refuse to respond to my challenges either here or on their home blogs. We several critics of the Darwinian hoax have not existed, do not now exist, will not exist, and must not exist. There is no place for a determined evolution in the congenital atheist mentality, nor apparently is there any place for us in the minds of those whose credo demands a personal God. Just as Myers identifies himself as a godless liberal, so does the Discovery Institute define its membership by adding - "a Christian Institution." We can also be certain that everything in the universe is material or it wouldn't be there. There is no place for either of these violently opposed postures in any aspect of scientific inquiry. There never has been and there never will be.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. August 2007 15:59
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46b8d772033e6b3c;act=ST;f=14;t=1272;st=2790
Please read today's installment of "The Bathroom Wall" which is where my comments ended up. I love all the free publicity. What is especially neat is the fact that since I have a dial up modem it is very difficult to block my comments at least as far as Elsberry seems to think. Thanks Wes. I'll remenber that!
Both Elsberry and Myers have to be constantly vigilant in order to keep their mindless "groupthinks" from being "penetrated." I love that Freudian slip "penetrated" almost as much as I do Myers' constant preoccupation with his "random biological ejaculations," as if there were some other kind!
What a pair of losers!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 09. August 2007, 05:56: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. August 2007 05:43
It is still there and listed on the first page under recent comments.
Sorry about that Wesley. I guess you will have to beef up your "security." Alternatively, wouldn't it be a lot simpler just to readmit me in good standing? You too P.Z.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. August 2007 15:33
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46ba1b3f44ba986c;act=ST;f=14;t=1272;st=2820
As usual my comments appear in "The Bathroom Wall" along with the usual name-calling and the standard Darwinian pablum. I repeat my conviction that sexual reproduction is incompatible with macroevolution and ask again for demonstrations that I am wrong. They have never appeared and will not now.
These animals ask me questions which they know I can't answer there. I ask them to come here where I can respond to their childish interrogations in a neutral venue.
Let me add a few more of my convictions for them to consider. Allelic mutation never had anything to do with creative evolution either. Neither did either Mendelian or population genetics. All progressive evolution proceeded from within the relatively few creatures which WERE capable of producing offspring markedly different from themselves. Such creatures are apparently no longer present and creative evolution is a phenomenon of the distant past.
Natural selection is very real, serving only to stabilize the species. It has nothing to do with either speciation or the PAST formation of any of the higher categories.
The denizens of Pharyngula, RichardDawkins.net and Panda's Thumb represent some of the last surviving Darwinian "groupthinks," still blindly promoting an hypothesis which has no credibility and never did have. Furthermore, the self appointed, self anointed, leaders of these cults, Myers, Dawkins and Elsberry are all intellectual cowards who must ban their critics from their pathetic proceedings, dominated as they are by their shared atheism and intolerance to any departure from the standard Darwinian myth, the most failed hypothesis in the history of science.
The notion that chance ever played any role in the emergence and subsequent evolution of life is ridiculous and those that still can insist in that posture must be congenitally impaired. It seems little can be done for them.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is udeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 08. August 2007, 20:28: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. August 2007 20:33
This time my comment disappeared and didn't even appear in The Bathroom Wall. Let the record show that I have challenged the Darwinians to defend their silly dogma here or anywhere else. They know it and we know it and if they do not respond it means only one thing. They are cowards!
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. August 2007 05:36
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46bae57c6ad8da4d;act=ST;f=14;t=1272;st=2820
Thanks Wesley for more free publicity. I stand by everything I have said here, at One Blog A Day, at RichardDawkins.net and at Panda's Thumb. That hate blogs like Pharyngula and After The Bar Closes must exist is transparent proof that the atheist inspired Darwinian scheme is nothing but a figment of a "born that way," "dyed-in-the-wool," "prescribed" imagination. It is the most ridiculous interpretation of the living world ever conjured by a totally unfettered human imagination.
"Never in the history of human conflict have so many owed so little to so many."
after Winston Churchill
"Darwinians of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but your natural selection."
after Karl Marx
"Marx, Darwin and Freud are the three most crashing bores in the Western World."
William Golding
It is easy to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. August 2007 14:48
Admin, whoever that is, keeps deletimg my messages at Panda's Thumb and telling the brethren there not to respond to me there but at The Bathroom Wall instead. Also they keep calling me a troll. What is a troll, anyone with whom you disagree? I always thought it was a creature that hung out under bridges. That is not my style. I prefer open warfare myself.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 09. August 2007 15:11
I quoted some facts there. On my opinion the observation that evolution is over is well supported fact. I suppose darwinists can use their "no empty niches" evasion to explain the phenomenon. We will see.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. August 2007 17:08
Martin
You are doing a great job at After The Bar Closes. Don't be surprised if they ban you.
Nothing can change their minds now. No one cares to admit that he has dedicated his entire professional life to a myth, yet that is precisely what the Darwinists are faced with.
One of the many reasons I have such enormous respect for William Bateson is because he, the father of modern genetics, ultimately realized that Mendelism had absolutely nothing to do with organic evolution. I refer all to the Manifesto for documentation.
"A past evolution is undeniable. a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
