|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. September 2007 05:25
Arjun
It is obvious to me that you have not read or comprehended the substance of the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis, a touch of your mouse away along with my several responses posted there. Both indirect and direct evidence is presented there that the information responsible for what we see today was present long before it was expressed and was utilized by drastically different life forms. If you are unable to comprehend that paper I recommend that you refrain from comment because I have no intention of repeating its contents here or anywhere else. I also recommend you read my references which apparently you have not done.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. September 2007 05:48
Arjun
It is a cheap shot to identify me as Martin's mentor. Martin has reached his conclusions entirely independently. We just have reached the same conclusion that Darwinsm is a hoax, a conclusion which was also reached by every one of my sources and Martin's as well. Darwinians are all the same. They will go to any lengths to discredit any alternative to their atheist mysticism. Darwinians no longer even try to defend their foolishess as they realize it is indefensible. All they are left with is denigration of any alternative which is all that one sees at blogs like Pharynbgula and Panda's Thumb. If the PEH proves to be faulty, which most assuredly hasn't been established yet, nothing will save the Darwinian fairy tale from certain oblivion and with it all those who have mindlessly continued to support it. I look forward to it with unrestrained glee. Why it hasn't already happened is the real mystery.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 02. September 2007 09:47
quote:
It is obvious to me that you have not read...
You are mistaken, I have indeed read your paper.
quote:
...or comprehended the substance...
This is possible, though I did not notice much in the way of substance.
quote:
I have no intention of repeating its contents here or anywhere else.
Fine.
quote:
If the PEH proves to be faulty, which most assuredly hasn't been established yet, nothing will save the Darwinian fairy tale from certain oblivion and with it all those who have mindlessly continued to support it. I look forward to it with unrestrained glee.
If a better scientific explanation for the collective observations on the diversity of life on this planet comes along, then the currently accepted theory will become history.
quote:
Why it hasn't already happened is the real mystery.
Could it be that the scientific community does not see your PEH as a better alternative to current evolutionary theory?
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. September 2007 15:31
I find it interesting that the Darwinians would send Arjun here to prove that he doesn't understand the PEH at all, while at the same time they make no mention of me or my papers at their home enclaves, Pharyngula and Panda's Thumb. They used to send Alan Fox here but he became obnoxious and was asked to leave. Perhaps anonymous Arjun will do the same if given the opportunuty. In any event, as I did with Alan Fox, I see no reason to further respond to his messages. A person who cannot put his name to his comments should not be recognized, especially if he persists in proving that he is only interested in being disruptive.
Incidentally Arjun, whoever you are, I am not in the least interested in what others think of me, my hypotheses or my sources.
I should be flattered by this treatment because anyone who knows anything about either Pharyngula or Panda's Thumb knows that virtually ALL their energies are directed against Uncommon Descent, William Dembski and the "ID movement," a movement in which I have no involvement whatsoever. Similarly, nearly all the energies at Uncommon Descent are directed against the Darwinians. I am delighted to be ignored by both factions.
It is unfortunate that I have been banned from Uncommon Descent (twice and in my opinion three times) because EVERYTHING I have ever published pleads for Intelligent Design. I can only surmise it was due to David Springer's bullying tactics which I assume were approved by Dembski.
As best I can explain, Springer lets people back in only so he can have the pleasure of banning them once again. Bullies need that don't you know and he is one of the best.
The bottom line is that I am being carefully ignored by both sides in this idiotic debate and the reason is very clear to me. If I am recognized then so must all my sources be recognized. Neither faction is prepared for that because it will make them all look like fools which is just fine with me.
Let me put it this way. Who are the sources for the Darwinians? The answer is one another. Who are the sources for the Intelligent Design community? The answer is the same.
My sources are neither religious zealots nor atheists and neither am I. It is apparently my formal rejection of a living Christian God which seems to be anathema to both Uncommon Descent and the Discovery Institute. As for the Darwinians, led by the likes of Myers and Dawkins, even long dead Gods are unacceptable, which is all that I have ever found necessary to assume. Those that can deny even dead Creators do not qualify as scientists. No one has any business denying Gods in any event. I certainly have never claimed as much except as a ruse in order to get a thread introduced at Dawkins' fan club.
"God or Gods are dead but must have once existed."
It worked too - but for only about a week - one of my greatest achievements! It also set a world's record for number of views (60,000) in such a short period of time.
I can assure all that a Catholic priest will attend my dying days if that is possible. My daughter has assured me! In the meantime -
"Let my enemies devour each other"
Salvador Dali
"No sadder proof can be given by a man of his own littleness than disbelief in great men."
Thomas Carlyle
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
As proof of the accuracy of my assertions, I challenge P.Z. Myers, Wesley Elsberry and William Dembski to reprint this comment on their respective blogs or even provide a direct link to it. I am supremely confident that will never happen.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 02. September 2007, 17:28: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. September 2007 17:33
"Why is it that nobody understands me, yet everybody likes me?"
Albert Einstein
"Why is it that everybody understands me, yet nobody likes me?
John A. Davison
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 02. September 2007, 17:36: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 03. September 2007 04:33
quote:
I find it interesting that the Darwinians would send Arjun here...
I represent no one but myself. Nobody sent me here.
quote:
Incidentally Arjun, whoever you are, I am not in the least interested in what others think of me, my hypotheses or my sources.
If you think it matters who I am, you could always check my profile.
[ 03. September 2007, 08:30: Message edited by: Arjun ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. September 2007 05:17
Arjun doesn't seem to understand. He no longer exists. Besides, the link he provided yielded nothing concerning his identity or anything else.
[ 03. September 2007, 05:23: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 03. September 2007 08:31
quote:
Besides, the link he provided yielded nothing concerning his identity or anything else.
My mistake, it works now.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. September 2007 08:38
Guess what folks. It is none other than Alan Fox aka Arjun.
You don't exist Alan. Got that? Write that down.
[ 03. September 2007, 08:46: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. September 2007 08:54
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/08/21/bens-blog/
I can no longer comment at Ben Stein's blog which at last count had over 900 comments. My browser can't handle it.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 03. September 2007, 08:59: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. September 2007 13:20
Alan Fox/Arjun has always been negative wherever he has surfaced. Worse, he is a regular at "After The Bar Closes" where he has also denigrated Martin. Not only that, he is a declared fan of Richard Dawkins! I am through responding to these anonymous cowards with which internet blogs are so afflicted. Without exception they contribute absolutely nothing to any discussion. Fox most certainly never has even when he was using his (I presume) real name!
Also he WAS sent over from "After The Bar Closes" just as I first claimed. He has been one of Elsberry's goons for as long as I can remember. Elsberry, like Myers and Dawkins as well, are terrified at the prospect of engaging me in a neutral forum like "brainstorms." That is why all they dare do is send out their toadies. Myers never showed at the thread he himself introduced at One Blog A Day and I bet he won't show here either. Neither will Elsberry or Dawkins. Having long ago banned me from their own "union shops," they display their insecurity for all to see by sending forth their hired help to do what they themselves are terrified to even dream of. It is both wonderfully revealing and gratifying. Naturally -
I love it so!
It doesn't get any better than this.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 07. September 2007 09:20
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=46e059963a63459d;act=ST;f=14;t=5188
This clown Arden Chatfield is exceeding my wildest expectations in proving to the whole world that he is an intellectual zero. Like everyone else at Elsberry's "inner sanctum," "our forum," all he can do is denigrate Martin, my most valued ally. He was even stupid enough to introduce a whole thread just for that purpose. Thank you Arden for proving that you are not only monumentally ignorant, but superbly masochistic as well. The remarkable thing is that Elsberry tolerates the likes of Chatfield and accordingly actively promotes the destruction of his own blog. It is a beautiful thing to witness. Keep up the good work Wes!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
oldmaninthesky
Member
Member # 6038
|
posted 08. September 2007 05:39
quote:
sending forth their hired help to do what they themselves are terrified to even dream of
yeah, a bit melodramatic don't you think Davidson?
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
