|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 08. September 2007 06:50
You mean you clowns are displaying yourselves as fools for nothing? Send over the A team if you have one. Not a chance!
It is hard to believe isn't it.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison with one D as in John Davison Rockefeller.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. September 2007 09:25
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/08/21/bens-blog/
Please visit Ben Stein's blog where Glen Davidson, another one of Elsberry's goons, was stupid enough to call attention to me on message 1122. I recommend Alan Fox join him there too. The more the merrier. Follow the next 24 hours to see how Glen Davidson responds to my request that we compare credentials.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 09. September 2007, 09:34: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 09. September 2007 11:40
quote:
I recommend Alan Fox join him there too.
I just skimmed through the thread as you recommended. I left a comment there, but it is awaiting moderation.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. September 2007 20:00
That is odd. My comments appear and my last one is still the terminal one several hours after I sent it in. I think everyone is waiting for Glenn Davidson to present his credentials. He has another 10 hours to produce or shut his arrogant Darwinian mouth. He, like Alan Fox, is just another one of Elsberry's goons, contributing nothing but Darwinian pablum and denigration wherever he surfaces.
"Let my enemies devour each other."
Salvador Dali
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
oldmaninthesky
Member
Member # 6038
|
posted 10. September 2007 02:41
quote:
He has another 10 hours to produce or shut his arrogant Darwinian mouth.
Is this how you win debates? Credential top-trumps?
Anybody would think somebody like a patent clerk would have no chance.
10 hours to produce or else what happens Davidson?
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 10. September 2007 05:53
oldmanintheskydidn'tdoit,
Einstein published his work in refereed journals, which for the last hundred years has been the standard venue for scientific publication.
The truth is not subject to debate and never was. Accordingly, nothing was ever "settled" that way. Quite the contrary, debates are for sophomoric amateur debating societies like Panda's Thumb where intellectual nobodies hold forth denigrating anyone who has ever dared to question Darwinian mysticism, the most idiotic, the most failed fantasy ever produced by the human imagination.
What have you ever produced in hard print? I'll bet nothing of consequence. If you had you would be using your real name instead of that stupid alias. Even your fearless leader, Wesley Elsberry, has never produced a valid paragraph dealing with the mechanism of evolution. You are both cowards as are all your anonymous cronies, living, breathing proofs that you are "born that way," "dyed-in-the-wool," "prescribed" losers.
"Everything is determined....by forces over which we have no control."
Albert Einstein
I love it so!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 10. September 2007, 08:30: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 10. September 2007 06:03
What happens is entirely up to Glen Davidson. My name is Davison as in John Davison Rockefeller.
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 10. September 2007 12:09
John,
the page is very large and it takes a lot of time to load it. It reminds me of the One blog a day about doctor Meyeres. These sites are not very fit for many responses.
Btw. doctor Myeres changed his Laternaria for some kind of spider at his page. I don't know why he held there Laternaria lucifera for so long. Maybe he supposed it can support Zoomimese. Many neodarwinists believe that small locust can scare its predator by looking like aligator. Of course only from lateral side.
It is very funny to suppose that predator can be mislead by 3 cm locust and consider it for 5 meter long aligator.
But neverthenless darwinian phantasy see in every similarity mimikry, zoomimese etc.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 10. September 2007 14:06
Martin
What I want to know is are my recent comments appearing on your computer? I have no way of telling who is reading my comments when I am told that they are awaiting moderation. In other words, I may be the only one able to see my own recent comments.
IP: Logged
|
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 10. September 2007 15:21
John,
I cannot find there your name.
IP: Logged
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 11. September 2007 11:53
Definition of "loki troll" taken from urbandictionary
It is a troll posting a straw man of a position while subscribing to the opposite position.
The term originated in TalkOrigins.org where evolutionists pretending to be anti-evolutionists posted inflammatory and ridiculous arguments against evolution.
Loki troll: Evolution is wrong, tobacco is more advanced than humans because it has 48 chromosomes while humans ONLY have 46! (actual "dr." Kent Hovind quote)
Loki troll: I'm an atheist now! Let's go eat babies and murder people at random! I don't have a morality now!
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 11. September 2007 14:37
http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/more_on_dawkins/
I am having a ball above dismantling, with others, Richard Dawkins, Alan Fox's favorite "read."
Incidentally, Arjun is actually Alan Fox who at one time was banned from further participation here at "brainstorms." Apparently he is now welcome to do what he does best, which is to disrupt. He has never offered a positive comment anywhere of which I am aware. He follows me around like a dog, Wesley Elsberry's faithful Chihuahua.
I do not appreciate it.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 11. September 2007, 14:50: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 13. September 2007 02:47
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20738173/?GT1=10357#storyContinued
The above report supports my repeated claim that progressive evolution is finished and all that we see is rampant extinction. I see no sign that this can be reversed. I wonder if DaveScot will mention this over at Uncommon Descent.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
