|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 11. October 2007 17:29
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/
I recently discovered this new blog by Ben Stein and I recommend my message #130 where I commented on Glen Davidson who continues there what he finally was forced to abandon at Stein's original blog - the same old stale, meaningless, Darwinian, nonsense and character assassination. What a joke he really is!
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 13. October 2007, 05:13: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 12. October 2007 08:58
http://outcampaign.org/
Be sure to vist here to get your A (for atheist) Tshirt. They are selling like hot cakes!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 12. October 2007 15:04
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=470fcb1fff913c09;act=SA;f=14;t=5227
Please note that ISCID now has a thread in its honor at After The Bar Closes. I especially like the way stevestory (obviously another cowardly anononym) finds it necessary to describe it -
"brainstorms is now nothing but a message board where an old nut named Davison babbles."
Please also note the way my friend Martin has dispensed with stevestory. Thank you Martin and thank you stevestory for once again making a perfect ass of yourself. Who is willing to be next? Don't be shy!
It doesn't get any better than this.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 14. October 2007 06:11
I am curious. Am I the only one still allowed to post here at "brainstorms"? My supporters, Daniel Smith and Martin have both been banned. The situation here is reminiscent of what Elsberry did with me at Panda's Thumb. I was given "Davison's Soap Box" where I, and I alone, was allowed to hold forth until it disappeared off the bottom of the page never to be seen again. Is that the plan here as well? The recent developments here at "brainstorms" are, to say the least, bizarre. It looks as though we will never understand what it all means.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 14. October 2007 16:55
Arjun/Alan Fox insists on pestering me with private messages. I hope he is stupid enough to present the whole exchange at After the Bar Closes. If he continues to pursue me (he always has), I will present everything he has said. In the meantime, I request that since he has been banned from posting here, he should also be denied the use of the private message service. He is such a perfect loser, nothing but Wesley Elsberry's hired goon.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 14. October 2007 17:14
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/10/ffrf_recap.php#more
Be sure to check out this thread in which Myers has now decided that Christopher Hitchens is insane. It takes one to know one as the saying goes. Apparently poor Hitchens has a serious drinking problem as well.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evlution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 15. October 2007, 05:44: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 15. October 2007 06:59
I continue at the above blog, confident that I have a greater audience there than here.
[ 15. October 2007, 07:01: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 17. October 2007 12:52
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/10/eminent_scientist_behaving_bad.php#more
Here is a beauty. Imagine P.Z. Myers, hate personified, accusing James Watson of behaving badly! Furthermore, Watson may be correct. It is perfectly within the compass of my Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis that the various races of Homo sapiens may have had separate origins and not necessarily even from the same immediate ancestor. There is litte question that the modern horse was produced more than once and I see no reason whey that could not be true for Homo sapiens as well, or for that matter for any other true species. In my opinion the originally discrete human racial types actually favor such an interpretation and absolutely nothing precludes it. The monophyletic scenario of the Darwinians is without foundation in any event.
I am sure this will evoke some hate messages just as Watson's did from P.Z. Myers. That is all that Myers is good for these days. The same with Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins.
"Birds of a feather flock together."
Cervantes
I love it so!
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 19. October 2007 06:47
My situation here is reminiscent of my history at EvC and Panda's Thumb. At EvC they isolated me into what they called "Boot Camp" where I was supposed to learn how to "debate." I believe I was the first inmate there. Since I proved to be a very poor student, they finally banned me. There has never been any place for debate in science - only for discovery.
At Panda's Thumb I enjoyed a similar fate. No matter where my comments originated, they appeared only at "The Bathroom Wall." Not satisfied with that level of discrimination, Elsberry introduced "Davison's Soap Box" just for me. Like all the other threads at Panda's Thumb that also disappeared south off the page as new threads were introduced and with it any further participation by me.
At Pharyngula my single message was greeted by that paragon of civil discourse, P.Z. Myers, with "Your stench has preceeded you," thereby terminating any further input from me. I lasted almost a week at RichardDawkins.net before they finally realized I was not one of his fans!
Here too I have become isolated, without a single comment from anyone now for several days. While my enemies have been banned, so too have both my allies, Daniel Smith and Martin. It is becoming an old story being retold. Davison is a "crank," a "loony tune," "over the hill," "a bitter old man," and as some one put it -
"He used to be a decent scientist but something happened to him in the 1980s."
While I am old, I most surely am not bitter. Quite the contrary, I revel in such special attention as it is the best proof imaginable that I am onto something very substantial. It isn't everyone who can alienate both factions of a silly "debate" with such glittering success. I am content with my position in the contemporary scene and wouldn't have it any other way.
What "happened to him in the 1980's" was his sudden interest in the great mystery of organic evolution. At that point "he decided to direct the rest of his energies to that subject, the most challenging in all of biological science."
It is becoming increasingly evident to me that I am lecturing in an empty auditorium here at "brainstorms." Nevertheless I will continue for as long as those responsible for my presence here will permit, just as I have always done in every forum where I have participated.
I am also holding forth with my usual candor at -
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 19. October 2007 10:13
http://www.pandasthumb.org/
PvM (Pim van Meurs) now dominates the threads at Panda's Thumb. Wasn't he at one time forced to take an ethics course by his then employer, based on his questionable behavior? I believe he used to post here as well. It is only fitting he should naturally gravitate to Panda's Thumb.
"Birds of a feather flock together."
Cervantes
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 20. October 2007 18:11
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/10/how_is_an_eyeball_like_an_erec.php#comments
Be sure to check out this thread from P.Z. Myers. Not content to rant about "random biological ejaculations" (I thought all ejaculations were biological, but random too?), Meyers is now comparing eyeballs to erections!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
