|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 26. November 2007 15:21
http://outcampaign.org/
Here is the link provided by the Scarlet A at P.Z. Myers' Pharyngula and the author is none other than Richard Dawkins. I recommend that everyone give serious consideration to what this page really means. Ask youself as I have - what does this have to do with the search for the truth?
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 27. November 2007 09:05
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/
I refer to post #312 by a Shel S, whoever that may be. Needless to say, I am very pleased.
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
I just corrected my earlier error on the post #. 312 is correct at least for now.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 27. November 2007, 15:10: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 28. November 2007 13:54
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4412672427182333335&postID=7556043756485780134
I just posted this link at Ben Stein's blog. It represents my final venture into "blogging" and includes a great deal of significant material for those who might see some merit in my papers and those of my distinguished predecessors. That blog was permanently disabled by some anonymous creep who managed to post, in a single message, a substantial fraction of Darwin's "Origin of Species," a flight of Victorian fancy which had absolutely nothing to do with its title. If that coward had any integrity whatsoever he would delete that material and thereby allow that blog to resume. That he doesn't I regard as significant and compelling evidence that I must be on the right track.
It doesn't get any better than this.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable,"
John A. Davison
[ 29. November 2007, 10:35: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 29. November 2007 06:00
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/scandal_fatigue.php#comments
Here is some more of P.Z. Myers' "hatespeech," this time directed against the Republican presidential candidates. It has become increasingly evident that Darwinian atheism is closely linked to political ultraliberalism. They may be pleiotropic expressions of exactly the same genetic condition. That conclusion certainly agrees with my experience in academe.
Once again we see what seems to be predestination or what I have called a prescribed evolution. Compulsively intolerant, proudly proclaimed atheists like Myers, Hitchens and Dawkins are victims, genetically blind to the order and purpose others of us see everywhere in the living world. Apparently there is nothing that can be done for them. Like nearly all pure white cats, they too are stone deaf to what Einstein called "the music of the spheres." Nevertheless, I feel a responsibility to call attention to this pathetic state of affairs, confident that my commentary will be ignored by those to which it is directed. There is only one reason one must be ignored by an adversary. It is FEAR!
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself."
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 29. November 2007, 06:27: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 01. December 2007 11:33
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4750/
This link is interesting since it supports my hypothetical reconstruction of the origins of Homo sapiens from one or more Neanderthal females. Such a female carrying a single chromosome rearrangenent in heterozygous form could produce semi-meiotically diploid homozygous female offspring in equal frequency, the orginal Neanderthal karyotype and a new karyotype which would be that of a Homo sapiens female. This sapiens female would then interbreed with a Neanderthal male to produce offspring intermediate morphologically as described in the above link. Subsequent sexual (Mendelian) reproduction by the hybrids would produce -
1NN:2NS:1SS genotypes in the typical 1:2:1 Mendelian ratio.
This reconstruction also favors my view that Neanderthal MUST have been our immediate ancestor simply because there was no other hominid around at the time H. sapiens first appeared in Europe.
It should also be noted that such a semi-meiotically produced female need only be produced once to generate a whole new species line. In all probability all evolutionary steps were relatively rare events, events which seem no longer to occur.
It is also possible that H. sapiens was separately produced from other hominid ancestors elsewhere on earth. I am inclined to the view that the various races of man were separately produced simply because it is hard for me to see how they could have acquired such very pronounced differences through adaptation to different habitats. Such differences are now disappearing to some degree through the blending effects of interbreeding. The Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis can easily encompass these scenarios and I know of nothing that precludes them.
Maybe this will elicit a response from the Darwinians but I doubt it. They are afraid of me and my science. In any event, there is no reason to insist on a monophyletic evolution for man or for any other species for that matter.
"Davison is the Darwinians' worst nightmare."
Terry Trainor
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 02. December 2007, 11:50: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 02. December 2007 19:03
The person, posting as Charles Darwin, has deleted his lengthy message, thus freeing up the following blog for comments once again.
http://evolutionisfinished.blogspot.com/
I welcome any civilized responses to my contention that creative evolution is no longer in progress.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. December 2007 06:32
Since Charles Darwin has threatened to shut me down again if I don't change my ways, I promise, like good little boy, not to say anything that might offend him. Instead, I will let those who agree with me slug it out with those that don't. I really need that blog. Can't you tell?
Enjoy yourselves folks. I sure do!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 04. December 2007 10:05
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/
I have been busy at the above link where I suspect, judging from the lack of participation here, that I have a somewhat larger audience. At my age and general condition, I have to ration my activities.
Also Alan Fox has suggested to me, in private mail, that "brainstorms" is about to shut down. I certainly hope that is not true as this forum has been the most liberal (in the true sense of the word) forum on the internet. It would be a great loss.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 04. December 2007 14:33
http://evolutionisfinished.blogspot.com/
It is now again possible to post at my blog. Don't hesitate to express yourself as I now solemnly promise not to delete anyone or anything. Don't miss this once in a lifetime opportunity to freely express yourself. Just remember - what happens in cyberdumb stays in cyberdumb!
I love it so!
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 04. December 2007, 19:36: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 05. December 2007 06:55
Global warming seems to have skipped over Burlington, Vermont.
http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=burlington%2C+vermont
Note the almanac data. Normal high temperature on December 4th is 36F and this year it's 12 degrees lower. The record high on that date is in 1941 at 67F and the record low was -9 set in 1989.
Some climatologists are predicting that the worm has turned and the earth is in for a period of global cooling. Just be thankful no one has shut off your electricity yet to reduce CO2 emissions, Davison. Here's a tip from your old pal, Dave: stock up on blankets and long underwear just in case the global warming nutjobs get their way. :-)
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 05. December 2007 10:32
I see that DaveScot aka David Springer is still obsessed with me. Imagine, going to the trouble to check the Burlington Vermont Weather, as if that had any significance whatsoever. I suggest that he present his opinions about my convictions at UD or how about at Ben Stein's blog where his cynical, personally directed remarks would find a much greater audience. He won't of course. He is no better than Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and P.Z. Myers. My adversaries all publicly pretend that I and my sources do not exist. They are terrified that we might be right.
Speaking of my sources, I wonder if Springer ever bothered to read Tim Flannery's "The Weather Makers." Somehow I doubt it. He seems to be more impressed with the guy who founded the TV Weather Channel than with first class minds like Tim Flannery, James Lovelock and Tony Blair. Those like Springer who ignore and even deny hard data are a dime a dozen in today's polarized world. They are no better than the "Three Stooges" of Evolutionary Science, Myers, Hitchens and Dawkins, who are also, like Springer, in a state of irreversible congenital denial. I greatly enjoy adversaries with those qualities. They are all helpless victims of their prescribed fates to be the real losers in the lottery of life.
"A fanatic is one who cannot change his mind and will not change the subject."
Winston Churchill
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 05. December 2007, 10:34: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 06. December 2007 11:57
http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-topic/climate-change-is-co2-the-cause/#comments
Note that David Springer is once again doing everything in his power to convince the world that global warming is NOT anthropogenic. I wonder if he questions if the deforestation of the tropics, a major sink for CO2, is anthropogenic. It must be wonderful to have such certainty.
It is not just CO2 that is involved. Nearly 7 billion large mammals are both polluting their water supply and using it up at an unsustainable rate. We have already seriously damaged or destroyed most of the world's coral reefs and many marine animals are dying from unexplained causes. The oceans of the world have become mankind's sewer.
It will be interesting to see what the recommendations will be of the Bali conference now in progress. I predict they will be both pessimistic and alarmist just as Tim Flannery, Tony Blair and many others have already maintained.
Keep up the good work Dave. I love adversaries like you, P.Z. Myers, Wesley Elsberry or any other blogmasters that have to ban all those with whom they do not agree. You are especially cowardly by seeking me out to treat with contempt, knowing full well that I cannot respond at your precious home base which you rule with an iron fist. You all, by your tactics, see to it that the field of inquiry remains yours and yours alone. Go ban someone else. You are through abusing me. You are ashamed to even mention my name. To prove my point, I challenge you to reproduce this message at Uncommon Descent or anywhere else for that matter.
It doesn't get any better than this!
"When little is known for certain, every man is an expert."
John A. Davison
"Men believe most what they least understand."
Montaigne
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 06. December 2007, 12:00: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 06. December 2007 19:55
DaveScot's knee jerk response this morning is vintage David Springer, arrogant, unnecessary and without rationale, designed only to denigrate me and my distinguished sources. He will not engage me in any forum for exactly the same resons that Myers, Dawkins and Hitchens won't. He fears me and those whom I cite.
It doesn't get any better than this.
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
