|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. January 2008 05:50
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/
As one can see, I am also raling against anonymity at Ben Stein's blog. It is a dirty job but someone has got to do it. Anonymity is the scourge of internet communication. It is cowardly, anti-intellectual and degenerate.
My last comment still awaiting approval is #514.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 09. January 2008, 14:05: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 13. January 2008 09:26
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/01/sunday_is_a_big_day_for_minnes.php#comments
Be sure to visit this thread where P.Z. Myers, having totally abandned any pretense of science, now dedicates all his energy to the establishment of Universal Atheism. This is scary stuff if you ask me. Our enemies within are every bit as dangerous as those without.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 14. January 2008 02:55
http://www.youngcosmos.com/blog/archives/168#respond
Sal Cordova's blog is worth attention and this thread in particular is interesting. He claims atheists (Darwinians) are not immoral. I would like to be able to agree but atheists have no basis for morality as far as I know. If one denies a Creator, one denies the Judeo-Christian ethic from which which all Christian morality is derived. This offers an immediate explanation for how P.Z. Myers is able to describe the President of the United States, a nation founded on God, as "asshole-in-chief" and the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, as "bennie." Where is the morality in such expressions? From what ethical code are they derived?
Where is the morality in Stephen Jay Gould's characterization of human intelligence as "an evolutionary accident" or his comparison of evolution with a "a drunk reeling back and forth between the gutter and the bar room door?
So I am not certain that atheists are always capable of moral behavior. Morality depends on a distinction between right and wrong as defined by society. Our society as described by the Declaration of Independence is a theistic society. Is there a place for atheism (Darwinism) in American culture and, if there is, what is its function? My answer is that its function is to destroy that society.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 16. January 2008 09:49
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=14;t=5152;st=150#entry93484
This page is remarkable for demonstrating how even Wesley Elsberry is now frantically entering the fray in defense of the Darwinian hoax. Normally he lets his loyal cronies do the work for him, poor "prescribed," "dyed-in-the-wool" clowns like Glen Davidson and, believe it or not - "oldmanintheskydidn'tdoit." It makes my hair hurt just thinking about "After The Bar Closes," Elsberry's "inner sanctum," with Pharyngula another "Alamo of Darwinian mysticism."
It is hard to believe isn't it!
I love it so!
"A past evoluition is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 18. January 2008 19:08
http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=479148be26246ff3;act=ST;f=14;t=5374
Be sure to check out this thread by Kristine, whoever that is. In it she tries to discredit Alfred Russel Wallace simply becuase he believed in spiritualism - as if that were a fatal disease. Wallace was ten times the scientist that Darwin ever was and later in life completely abandoned the myth he helped produce.
I strongly recommend Wallace's book - "Man's Place In The Universe." He was a pioneer in revealing the fragility of the earth's climate. It should be required reading for every denier of anthropogenic global warming and should be followed by Tim Flannery's "The Weather Makers."
"You can lead a man to the literature but you cannot make him read."
After the horse that refused to drink.
"a past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 20. January 2008 06:00
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/01/tune_in_sunday_morning.php#comments
Please note that P.Z. Myers is now expanding his atheist horizons to include AIR AMERICA.
I feel sorry for the citizens of the State of Minnesota, especially the patrons of its University.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 22. January 2008, 14:48: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 22. January 2008 05:32
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/01/hitchens_has_big_brass_ones.php#comments
Be sure not to miss this thread announcing a debate between Christopher "hiccup" Hitchens and Jay Richards of the Discovery Institute. It should be a hoot, especially if Hitchens remains true to form and shows up plastered as some of of Myers' faithful followers predict. I would love to take him on drunk or sober and I refer to myself not Hitchens!
It is hard to believe isn't it?
I love it so!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 23. January 2008 04:08
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/09/28/come-on-guys%e2%80%a6you-can-do-better-than-that/#comment-5832
I am coping with anonymous blowhards above as well as on my blog -
john.a.davison.free.fr/
Anonymity has virtually destroyed rational communication on the world wide web. It is a symptom of a degenerating society. I know of not a single contribution of substance that has come from an anonymous source. Perhaps someone else can produce an example.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 24. January 2008 06:33
http://www.lifescienceprize.org/
I feel miffed that I did not make this list of evolutionists, or did I miss my name?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 24. January 2008 10:42
http://john.a.davison.free.fr/?p=13#comment-181
Please follow this demonstration of what is wrong with anonymity and how it is used by the kind of low life with which the internet is so blessed.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
DaveScot
Member
Member # 1545
|
posted 24. January 2008 16:47
Hi John,
I counted 5 different names (including you) who have posted to your blog. You banned one of them. That's 20% bannination rate which exceeds mine by a country mile. You've learned your lessons well, grasshopper.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 25. January 2008 03:44
David Springer aka DaveScot
I am very pleased with the progress of my blog. Your Uncommon Descent has a huge following, nearly as great as Pharyngula's. Adolf Hitler had a huge following too and for much the same reasons.
It seems you have special dispensations allowing you to comment here. Neither of my two declared supporters, Daniel Smith and Martin, are allowed that opportunity. Hopefully, some day this bizarre situation will be explained. I hope I am still alive to enjoy it!
Thanks for commenting.
"If you tell the truth, you can be certain, sooner or later, to be found out."
Oscar Wilde
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
