|
Author
|
Topic: John A. Davison: An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 09. June 2008 00:58
http://www.overwhelmingevidence.com/oe/node/550#comment
As you can see Denyse O'Leary, co-sponsor of Uncommon Descent, has not only cited my "heresies" but allowed me to respond on her blog "Overwhelming Evidence," something out of the question at Uncommon Descent. Naturally, I am very pleased.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 10. June 2008 04:53
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/06/sorry_vox_i_dont_debate_crazy.php
I just told P.Z. Myers, via his one way communication system, that I would be delighted to "debate" him in favor of the necessary existence of one or more Gods. I also dared him to publish my challenge. Of course he won't, because he is terrified of me!
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 11. June 2008 12:45
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/evolution-and-gravity/#comments
Dave Scot/David Springer now claims the theory of evolution has not been tested. One does not test reality, one only attempts to explain it.
Besides, there is as yet, sensu strictu, no "theory of evolution." There are only a couple of perfectly failed hypotheses, Lamarckism and Darwinism. The Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis continues to remain in accord with every revelation from the fossil record and the experimental laboratory. Since, in my opinion, creative evolution is no longer in progress, it may prove impossible to elevate the PEH to the status of "theory" as understood in the inanimate world of Physics and Chemistry. We may have to assume it is correct by the time honored method of the exhaustion of all possible alternatives. That would suit me just fine!
Words have meaning Dave. Try to be more careful how you use them.
It is hard to believe isn't it?
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 12. June 2008, 02:54: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 14. June 2008 05:42
http://www.overwhelmingevidence.com/oe/node/550#comment
My exchange with Bob Mort, whoever that is, has apparently finally terminated.
I thank Denyse O'Leary for allowing me to speak on Overwhelming Evidence.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic
