|
Author
|
Topic: Is 'Matter' Contracting As Space Expands?
|
Richard
Member
Member # 857
|
posted 08. November 2003 11:16
Erik,
I only have time for a quick response now, but will elaborate Mon. or Tues.
The ex-con forces described are only one factor in determining degrees of freedom and polarization; other factors are velocity, rotatation, oscillations, and the basic premise that space-time is contracting with time.
A motionless space particle (angraviton) defines a non-dilated frame. Space particles can have motion relative to each, and this causes time dilations.
Gravitons and photons have velocities of c. They move through space by moving from one space particle to another. Gravtions time dilate each space particle they pass through, photon's don't.
Photons trapped in a group of space particles aquire rest mass, thus they become mass particless. In this state they follow a rotating and oscillating path determined by the fact that the space particles that they are trapped in are contracting with time, and these space particles rotate and oscillate relative to their previous position in time as they contract.
Richard
IP: Logged
|
|
Kastl
Member
Member # 1005
|
posted 25. November 2003 12:15
Aliet Jacob,
I'm a little confused about your theory of matter contracting vice space expanding. It appears to me that a constant speed of light would weigh in favor of space expanding (i.e., an expanding Universe).
Also, allow me to address those five explanations that you mentioned regarding the expansion of the Universe.
It should be obvious that the Universe is a dynamic, nonlinear system, as evidenced by the Universe's alternating (acceleration->deceleration->acceleration) history of expansion. The initial acceleration phase, referred to as 'inflation', was followed by a deceleration phase and the current acceleration phase.
This history of alternating expansion hints at the existence of a feedback loop - and there is one. We know that the expansion rate has an effect on the rate that matter (i.e., mass) comes into the observable universe. What hasn't been recognized is a second relationship involving the expansion rate of the Universe (exp') and the mass of the observable universe (Mou): exp' = Mou'/Mou, where Mou' is dMou/dt. This second relationship is derived from Einstein's "Space without matter is meaningless".
The result of these two relationships, and the resulting feedback loop, is a self-regulating, self-organizing Universe – a Universe that doesn’t need ‘residual energy left over from the big bang’, ‘vacuum energy released as space expands’, ‘the repulsive force (Einstein’s [non-zero] Cosmological constant) exceeding gravitational attraction’, ‘dark matter’, or ‘dark energy’ to explain its behavior.
IP: Logged
|
|
DN
Member
Member # 996
|
posted 27. November 2003 01:59
Katsl,
First of all, conspansion is not my theory.
Its possible that you may be confusing a cycle with a feedback loop. Or self-regulation with self-organization.
If its a feedback mechanism, and I will grant you that, which parts exactly are interacting?
Why would we consider it as a feedback loop and not a cycle?
[ 27. November 2003, 02:01: Message edited by: DN ]
IP: Logged
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic