ISCID Forums


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» ISCID Forums   » General   » Brainstorms   » Answering: The advantages of theft over toil (Page 3)

 
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Answering: The advantages of theft over toil
Jim Skipper
Member
Member # 1510

Icon 1 posted 02. March 2005 17:12      Profile for Jim Skipper   Email Jim Skipper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the other may have addressed this; if so I apologize for hitting it again.

Jerry wrote:
quote:
Because the stark reality of you doing this is impossible. If you could somehow supernaturally flip a coin once a second, there still are only 4.6 x 10^17 seconds in the universe since the big bang.
You really underestimate the volume of chemical reactions on the planet. Reality is more like if you got everyone on the planet to flip a coin each second. It should be pretty obvious that if you have 7 billion people flipping a coin every second, you are going to get much faster results than if just one person is flipping a coin every second.

Imagine then Evan's very insightful Yatze analogy. Imagine 7 billion people playing Yatze at the same time. You are going to have every possible Yatze combination occur an incredibly large number of times.

And 7 billion is a tiny fraction of the chemical reactions going on on our planet every second.

IP: Logged
Jerry D. Bauer
Member
Member # 756

Icon 1 posted 04. March 2005 17:56      Profile for Jerry D. Bauer   Email Jerry D. Bauer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
*******You really underestimate the volume of chemical reactions on the planet. Reality is more like if you got everyone on the planet to flip a coin each second. It should be pretty obvious that if you have 7 billion people flipping a coin every second, you are going to get much faster results than if just one person is flipping a coin every second.

Imagine then Evan's very insightful Yatze analogy. Imagine 7 billion people playing Yatze at the same time. You are going to have every possible Yatze combination occur an incredibly large number of times.

And 7 billion is a tiny fraction of the chemical reactions going on our planet every second. ******

Hello, Jim. Don't reckon we've ever run across each other before real name to real name, anyhow. [Wink]

Evan's observation is a clear case of intelligent design at work. For example, flipping 500 coins and having them all come up heads works out to log2(2^500) = 500 bits of information and this is simply impossible to achieve because there is not enough time since the big bang to do this.

But intelligent design can easily do this. I will flip the coins, intelligently decide to leave the heads and re-flip only the tails. This will take only a few flips until I have all heads.

This is the same concept as in the Yatze analogy. Intelligence + work = intelligent design. And I am firmly convinced this is the way life was designed.

But let’s look at your addition to the analogy mathematically, and see what “7 billion people playing Yatze at the same time” could accomplish from the aspect of our coins (I don‘t play Yatze and wouldn‘t know the first thing about it). In fact, let’s take it all the way and just calculate what all of nature could accomplish and then we will know.

We can determine an actual upper probability bound based on the reality of nature. Let's allow every particle that comprises the matter of the universe to help you in flipping 500 coins per seconds and see how many bits could be generated since the big bang. There are estimated to be 10^80 particles in the observable universe:

10^80 flips / 1 second x 4.73 x 10^17 seconds = 4.73 x 10^97 flips.

We're still nowhere close to the 500 bits of information needed for Complex Specified Information, the type of information found in a living cell to form. In fact, the maximum amount of information that could possibly have been manufactured by nature given all the time since the big bang works out to be H (bits) = log2(4.73 x 10^97) = 325 bits.

I think that 325 bits is the actual UPB, but Dembski went back before the big bang and we KNOW his 500 bits ain’t gonna happen. That seems the standard UPB in ID and I agree it should be.

Do you understand how many thousands of bits of information the simplest living cell contains, or would you like me to calculate this for you as well? Not a problem, just ask.

IP: Logged
Jim Skipper
Member
Member # 1510

Icon 1 posted 08. March 2005 20:46      Profile for Jim Skipper   Email Jim Skipper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
325 bits? I am a computer programer so maybe bits means something different to me than it does to you. What do YOU mean when you say "bits?"
IP: Logged
Jim Skipper
Member
Member # 1510

Icon 1 posted 12. March 2005 16:25      Profile for Jim Skipper   Email Jim Skipper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, really, tell me what you mean by 325 bits. Because each coin represents a bit. A bit is a 1 or 0, which equates to heads or tails. Therefore 4.73 x 10^97 flips is 4.73 x 10^97 bits. That is a LOT of information.
IP: Logged
Jerry D. Bauer
Member
Member # 756

Icon 1 posted 14. March 2005 19:47      Profile for Jerry D. Bauer   Email Jerry D. Bauer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
*****No, really, tell me what you mean by 325 bits. Because each coin represents a bit. A bit is a 1 or 0, which equates to heads or tails. Therefore 4.73 x 10^97 flips is 4.73 x 10^97 bits. That is a LOT of information.*****

Hey, Jim:

First understand the type of information we are working with: "A numerical measure of the uncertainty of an experimental outcome."

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=information

Bits are normally mathematically expressed as H.

"A bit (abbreviated b) is the most basic information unit used in computing and information theory. A single bit is a one or a zero, a true or a false, a "flag" which is "on" or "off", or for that matter any two mutually exclusive states.

Claude E. Shannon first used the word bit in a 1948 paper. Shannon's bit is a portmanteau word for binary digit (or possibly binary digit). He attributed its origin to John W. Tukey."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit

You're right. Those 500 coins represent 1 for the heads we were calculating and 0 for non-heads.

Shannon calculated bits:

 -

But it is generally regarded that Shannon's formula can reduce down (and more often is, than is not) to H = log2W. That was the one we were using.

W is the statistical weight which I calculated as 2 possible microstates of the matter (heads or tails) to the power of the total number of pieces, or 2^500.

But really, 325 bits of information is not that much information as I can randomly generate 325 bits of numbers in just a few seconds.

The deal is that nature is not in the information producing business. Only intelligence is. [Wink]

IP: Logged


All times are East Coast
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3 
 
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    Top Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | ISCID

All content © ISCID and content contributor 2001-2003

The ISCID Forums are aimed at generating insight into the nature of complex systems (e.g. biological complexity, organizational complexity, etc.) and the ontological status of purpose, especially from the vantage point of various information- and design-theoretic models.

Indexed by UBB Spider Hack  |  Powered by Infopop Corporation UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.1

PCID | Encyclopedia | Brainstorms | The Archive | News | Essay Contests | Chat Events | Membership