|
Author
|
Topic: Darwinism as Delusion (response to Richard Dawkins by John Davison)
|
Martin
Member
Member # 2001
|
posted 24. March 2007 18:30
Hypocrite Fox used his photo too there. It's the same tactic as they used with you. They are somehow afraid to post their photo so we cannot judge their atheistic physiognomies as well - except Christine of course. She use her college photo when she was 30 years younger.
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
snowball
Member
Member # 4653
|
posted 03. April 2007 09:32
"Delusion" presupposed the exsistence of the "function" designed for a purpose.
[ 03. April 2007, 09:33: Message edited by: snowball ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 03. April 2007 16:06
snowball, whoever that is.
Sorry but I don't get it.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 15. September 2007 14:16
***Attention, habitues of After The Bar Closes, Panda's Thumb, EvC, Pharyngula or any other surviving stronghold of Darwinian mysticism. Christian Fundamentalists are also invited.***
Here is another one of my several threads to gleefully offer itself up to pollution by the likes of Alan Fox/arjun or oldmanintheskydidn'tdoit or any other emissary from After The Bar Closes, that citadel of civilized discourse and evolutionary wisdom. I am sure they will be welcome here as they already are wherever I have presented my science here at "brainstorms."
This is the "new brainstorms," apparently under new management. Enjoy this opportunity to "dump on Davison" with gay abandon. It may be your last chance.
I love it so!
A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 15. September 2007, 14:42: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 29. September 2007 10:05
quote:
This is the "new brainstorms," apparently under new management.
Under no management, even.
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 29. September 2007 11:04
Why not invite Pim van Meurs (PVM) back? He is another homozygous Darwimp and frequent thread presenter at Panda's Thumb. Why screw around admitting lightweights like Alan Fox and oldmanintheskydidn'tdoit when we can be really dazzled by a class act like Pim van Meurs? Or has he been banned?
I love it so.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
John A. Davison
[ 29. September 2007, 11:07: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
nosivad
Member
Member # 767
|
posted 29. September 2007 11:18
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/09/uk-on-id-creati.html#new-comments
Here is a current example of Pim van Meurs' (PvM's) activity at Panda's Thumb.
What is remarkable are the rational comments by David Stanton. I predict he will soon be relegated to the Bathroom Wall or worse, bannished entirely.
"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."
[ 30. September 2007, 05:45: Message edited by: nosivad ]
IP: Logged
|
|
Arjun
Member
Member # 6108
|
posted 30. September 2007 06:15
quote:
What is remarkable are the rational comments by David Stanton.
I entirely agree with your assessment, John, though I am surprised to see you endorsing them. quote:
I predict he will soon be relegated to the Bathroom Wall or worse, bannished(sic) entirely.
As he is posting on-topic and in a civilized tone, I very much doubt it. He is expressing a pro-evolutionary view, by the way.
IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic