David L. Hagen
Member
Member # 323
|
posted 17. November 2006 23:34
Following are two overview summaries for Wikipedia (with Wiki formatting & links). Please affirm/critique/comment.
------------------------------------
Overview ID & Conventional science
Intelligent design practitioners model empirical data of abiotic and biotic systems to distinguish evidence for intelligent causation from [[Forces|natural forces]], ranging from the formation of the [[Universe]] to [[Biology|biological systems]] and [[human beings]].
[{{cite book|author=Guillermo Gonzalez|title=The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery|year=2004|id=ISBN 0895260654}} ] [{{cite book|author=Michael Behe|title=Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution|year=2006|publisher=Free Press|id=ISBN 0743290313}}]
By contrast, orthodox [[science|physical]] and [[biology|biological]] sciences, rely exclusively on [[natural science|natural]] explanations for [[abiogenesis]] and [[macroevolution]] through processes such as [[Urey-Miller_experiment|lightning]], [[mutation]], and [[natural selection]], starting after the [[Big bang]].
[[http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2002/1106id2.shtml AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory]]
-------------------------
Peer Review
The Discovery Institute maintains an annotated list of articles it submits are peer-reviewed and support the concept of Intelligent Design.
[[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640&program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)]]
William Dembski assembled a list of "Ten peer reviewed ID articles."
[ [http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.09.Expert_Report_Dembski.pdf Expert Witness Report: William A. Dembski, The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design, Appendix 3: Ten Peer-Reviewed ID Articles (with Annotations)] ]
Mainstream scientists criticize these articles as not being peer reviewed, not being in major scientific journals, or not supporting or referring to ID.
---------------------------
Then please weigh into the discussion and help with editing at:
Intelligent Design: Wikipedia
[URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Intelligent_design Talk:Intelligent Design[/URL]
[ 17. November 2006, 23:41: Message edited by: David L. Hagen ]
IP: Logged
|
Printer-friendly view of this topic